• Doctor
  • GP practice

Ashburn Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

74-75 Toward Road, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR2 8JG (0191) 567 1035

Provided and run by:
Ashburn Medical Centre

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 11 November 2016

The Care Quality Commission has registered Ashburn Medical Centre to provide primary care services.

The practice provides services to approximately 4,500 patients from one location, Ashburn Medical Centre, 74-75 Toward Road, Sunderland, SR2 8JG. We visited this location as part of this inspection.

Ashburn Medical Centre is a small sized practice providing care and treatment to patients of all ages, based on a General Medical Services (GMS) contract agreement for general practice. The practice is part of the NHS Sunderland clinical commissioning group (CCG).

Information taken from Public Health England placed the area in which the practice was located in the second most deprived decile. (A decile is a method of splitting up a set of ranked data into 10 equally large subsections). In general, people living in more deprived areas tend to have greater need for health services. The average male life expectancy is 74 years, which is five years lower than the England average and the average female life expectancy is 80 years, which is three years lower than the England average.

The percentage of patients reporting with a long-standing health condition is much higher than the national average (practice population is 57.5 % compared to a national average of 54.0%). The percentage of patients over the age of 65 (at 20.5%) is higher than the England average of 17.1%.

The practice has three GP partners, all of which are female. There is also one salaried GP (female), a trainee GP (male), a practice manager, an assistant practice manager, a nurse prescriber (female), two practice nurses (female), one healthcare assistant (female) and seven administrative support staff. The practice is a training practice for trainee doctors, and third and fifth year medical students.

The practice is open between 8am to 6pm on a Monday, and between 7:30am and 6pm Tuesday to Friday. Reception services and phone lines are also available at these times. There is a local contract with the 111 service to provide telephone cover between 6 and 6:30pm. Appointments are available on a Monday from 8:30am to 11:30am and 1:30pm to 5:30pm. Tuesday through to Friday appointments are from 7:30am to 11:30am and 1:30pm to 5:30pm. Extended hours surgeries are offered four mornings a week from 7:30am (Tuesday to Friday).

The service for patients requiring urgent medical attention out of hours is provided by the NHS 111 service and Vocare, known locally as Northern Doctors Urgent Care Limited (NDUC).

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ashburn Medical Centre on 7 September 2016. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Nationally reported data taken from the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) for 2014/15 showed the practice had achieved 99.8% of the points available to them for providing recommended treatments for the most commonly found clinical conditions. The practice had a very high clinical exception reporting at 45.2% but there were some data errors discovered.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.


Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of patients with long-term conditions.

  • Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of admission to hospital were identified as a priority.
  • Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed. The practice’s electronic system was used to flag when patients were due for review. This helped to ensure the staff with responsibility for inviting people in for review managed this effectively.
  • Patients had regular reviews to check health and medicines needs were being met.
  • For those people with the most complex needs, GPs worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people.

  • The practice had identified the needs of families, children and young people, and put plans in place to meet them.
  • There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk, for example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. Childhood immunisation rates for the vaccinations given were mostly higher than CCG averages.
  • Patients told us that children and young people were treated in an age-appropriate way and were recognised as individuals, and we saw evidence to confirm this.
  • Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies.
  • The practice’s uptake for the cervical screening programme was 80.5%, which was slightly lower than the national average of 81.7% and the CCG average of 81.3 %. However, the exception reporting for this indicator was 53% with 1097 out of 2069 patients’ exception reported. The CCG had found a data recording error with the exception reporting within the practice.
  • Pregnant women were able to access an antenatal clinic provided by healthcare staff attached to the practice.

Older people

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people.

  • The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population. For example, all patients over the age of 75 had a named GP. Patients at high risk of hospital admission and those in vulnerable circumstances had care plans.
  • The practice was responsive to the needs of older people and offered home visits and urgent appointments for those with enhanced needs.
  • A palliative care register was maintained and the practice offered immunisations for pneumonia and shingles to older people.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of working age people (including those recently retired and students).

  • The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible and flexible. Extended hours surgeries were offered Tuesday to Friday from 7:30am for working patients who could not attend during normal opening hours.
  • The practice offered a full range of health promotion and screening which reflected the needs for this age group. Patients could order repeat prescriptions and book appointments on-line.
  • Additional services were provided such as health checks for the over 40s and travel vaccinations.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

  • The practice had identified 1.2% of their population with enduring mental health conditions on a patient register to enable them to plan and deliver relevant services.
  • The practice worked closely with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of people experiencing poor mental health including those with dementia. Care plans were in place for patients with dementia.
  • Patients experiencing poor mental health were sign posted to various support groups and third sector organisations.
  • The practice kept a register of patients with mental health needs which was used to ensure they received relevant checks and tests.
  • They had a system in place to follow up patients who had attended accident and emergency where they may have been experiencing poor mental health.
  • Staff had a good understanding of how to support people with mental health needs and dementia. The practice carried out advance care planning for patients with dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 11 November 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable.

  • The practice held a register of patients living in vulnerable circumstances, including those with a learning disability. The practice had identified 1% of their population with a learning disability on a patient register to enable them to plan and deliver relevant services.
  • Patients with learning disabilities were invited to attend the practice for annual health checks and were offered longer appointments, if required.
  • The practice had effective working relationships with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of vulnerable people.
  • Staff knew how to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies in and out of hours.
  • Improved arrangements were in place to support patients who were carers. The practice had systems in place for identifying carers and ensuring that they were offered a health check and referred for a carer’s assessment.