• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Vale Drive Medical Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Vale Drive, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN5 2ED (020) 8447 3566

Provided and run by:
Vale Drive Medical Practice

All Inspections

9 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Vale Drive Medical Practice on 9th June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

  • Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows: The partners had a vision and a strategy but not all staff were aware of this and their responsibilities in relation to it. However there was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.

  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, but several needed to be reviewed and updated. For example, the complaints policy, recruitment policy and the health and safety policy.
  • Staff understood their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. However, the system used to record and report safety concerns, incidents and near misses was inconsistent.
  • The processes in place for managing risk were not always robust. The calibration of some clinical equipment had taken place but not all the necessary items had been tested or had had a risk assessment carried out.

  • The learning needs of staff were not fully understood. The practice provided only limited mandatory training for staff, e-learning was not available.Individual training records we saw were incomplete and did not reflect the information we were told by staff.

  • The Patient Group Directives had been signed by the nurse but not signed by the authorised person..

  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The practice was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Staff worked with other health care professionals and other local providers to understand and meet the range and complexity of patients’ needs.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Review and update policies and procedures, to include recruitment, complaints, and health and safety.
  • Review its incident and significant event policies to ensure that reporting and recording systems are being used to identify risks and continuously improve patient safety.
  • Ensure that all appropriate medical equipment is annually calibrated.
  • Implement a system for assessing, monitoring and recording the training needs of staff and ensure that all staff have completed professional and mandatory training.Ensure that appropriately signed Patient Group Directives are on file to enable practice nurses to legally administer medicines in line with legislation.

In addition the provider should:

  • Provide patient information regarding the services available, for example the interpreting service and local bereavement service.Facilitate regular patient participation group meetings

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

19 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was a follow up inspection to check compliance with regulations relating to cleanliness and infection control. When we inspected on 26 September 2013, the provider was not carrying out a formal risk assessment of the practice in relation to infection prevention and control. Our concern was that the provider had not taken effective steps to ensure that people were protected against the risk of health care associated infection.

We asked the provider to take action and shortly after our inspection we were sent an action plan outlining how the provider intended to risk asses the practice in relation to infection prevention and infection control risks. We inspected again on 19 March 2014 to check compliance and saw that improvements had been made. For example, we were advised of arrangements for risk assessing and treating patients with suspected contagious diseases, in a manner which minimised risk of cross infection. A GP we spoke with explained infection prevention measures undertaken prior to minor surgery, to minimise risk of infection following a procedure.

26 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five patients attending appointments at the practice on the day of our visit. They told us they were happy with the care and treatment provided. For example, one patient told us 'I love it here, the doctor treats me very well.' Another patient said, 'it is excellent all round.' Everyone told us their privacy and dignity had been respected by staff. Patients said they received clear explanations of care and treatment from doctors and nurses. For example, one patient said, 'the doctor explains things well and in a way you understand.' Patients said it was relatively easy to make an appointment at a convenient time.

The practice worked in cooperation with others to ensure that appropriate care planning took place. Staff shared appropriate information with others when patients were referred to specialist services. Patients felt safe with staff and confident in the skills of doctors and nurses. Staff demonstrated the knowledge and skills needed to protect children and adults from possible abuse.

Patients we spoke with considered the practice was always very clean and we saw there were systems in place to reduce the risk of infection. However, although staff told us they were aware of infection control risks there had been no formal risk assessment of the practice in relation to infection prevention and control. As a result the provider could not be assured that people were protected against the risk of exposure to a health care associated infection.