• Doctor
  • GP practice

Wigmore Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

114 Woodside Road, Wigmore, Gillingham, Kent, ME8 0PW (01634) 231752

Provided and run by:
Wigmore Medical Centre

Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at Wigmore Medical Centre. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

18 October 2022

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall.

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

The full comprehensive report can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wigmore Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Why we carried out this inspection:

We carried out an announced inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 18 October 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

How we carried out the inspection:

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our judgement of the quality of care at this service is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

Our findings:

We have rated this practice as Good overall.

  • The practice’s systems, practices and processes helped keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse.
  • Risks to patients, staff and visitors were assessed, monitored and managed effectively.
  • Published results showed the practice was performing above local and England averages for breast cancer screening and in line with local and England averages for all other cancer screening.
  • Published results showed the practice was performing better than local and England averages when prescribing some hypnotics and in line with local and England averages when prescribing some antibiotics.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.
  • Staff treated patients with kindness, respect as well as compassion and helped them to be involved in decisions about care and treatment.
  • Feedback about the practice from the national GP patient survey was positive and in line with local and England averages.
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • There were processes to support good governance and management.
  • The practice involved patients, staff and external partners to help ensure they delivered high-quality and sustainable care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue with plans to monitor practice compliance with all safety alerts.
  • Continue to monitor reviews of patients with long-term conditions to help ensure best practice guidance is followed at each review.
  • Continue to monitor the effectiveness of action to help ensure patients with commonly undiagnosed conditions receive all relevant care and treatment.
  • Continue to monitor the effectiveness of action to help ensure patients prescribed medicines that require regular blood test monitoring are receiving such tests in line with best practice guidance.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

14 June 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Inadequate and the practice was placed into Special Measures.

After our inspection in April 2019 the practice wrote to us with an action plan outlining how they would make the necessary improvements to comply with the regulations.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 3 and 4 December 2019 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Requires Improvement. However, the responsive domain as well as all patient population groups was rated as Inadequate and the practice placed into Special Measures for a further period.

As our inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019 found that the provider had not fully met the Requirement Notices issued after the April 2019 inspection, we imposed conditions on Wigmore Medical Centre’s registration with the Care Quality Commission. The conditions were:

  1. The registered provider must not carry on any regulated activities at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE without the prior consent of the CQC and until such time as the following actions have been carried out at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE:

  1. A fire risk assessment is carried out at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE by a relevantly qualified organisation external to the practice and action has been taken in response to all findings of the fire risk assessment;

  1. Reasonable adjustments are carried out at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE to ensure that the premises comply with The Equality Act 2010.

  1. A patient accessible toilet is installed at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE.

After our inspection in December 2019 the practice wrote to us with an action plan outlining how they would make the necessary improvements to comply with the regulations.

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow-up inspection on 27 November 2020 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Good and the practice was taken out of Special Measures.

At our inspection on 27 November 2020 we found that the provider was complying fully the conditions imposed upon them and was not delivering regulated activities from the branch surgery. However, these conditions remained in force as the provider had not yet carried out the necessary activities required to reopen the Hempstead Medical Centre branch surgery.

The full versions of the reports for the April 2019, December 2019 and November 2020 inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wigmore Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Why we carried out this inspection:

We carried out an announced focussed inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre (attending only the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre) on 14 June 2022 to confirm that the practice was continuing to meet the legal requirements in relation to the conditions imposed upon them and to establish if they had carried out the necessary activities required to reopen the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre. This report covers findings in relation to those requirements and was not rated.

How we carried out the inspection:

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our judgement of the quality of care at this service is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

Our findings:

The practice was not rated as a consequence of this inspection.

The provider had met the conditions imposed upon them after our inspection in December 2019 by:

  • Keeping the branch surgery closed and not delivering any regulated activities there until permitted to do so by the Care Quality Commission.
  • Having a fire risk assessment carried out at the branch surgery by a relevantly qualified organisation external to the practice and taking action in response to all findings.
  • Making reasonable adjustments at the branch surgery to ensure that the premises complied with The Equality Act 2010.
  • Installing a patient accessible toilet at the branch surgery.

As the conditions imposed upon the provider after our inspection in December 2019 have been met in full, we are removing these conditions so that regulated activities that the provider is registered with CQC for, may now be delivered at the branch surgery Hempstead Medical centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

27 November 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Inadequate and the practice was placed into Special Measures. The full comprehensive report on the April 2019 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wigmore Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

After our inspection in April 2019 the practice wrote to us with an action plan outlining how they would make the necessary improvements to comply with the regulations.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 3 and 4 December 2019 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Requires Improvement. However, the responsive domain as well as all patient population groups was rated as Inadequate and the practice placed into Special Measures for a further period. The full comprehensive report on the December 2019 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wigmore Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

After our inspection in December 2019 the practice wrote to us with an action plan outlining how they would make the necessary improvements to comply with the regulations.

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow-up inspection on 27 November 2020 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019. This report covers findings in relation to those requirements.

Our judgement of the quality of care at this service is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations. The on-site inspection activity took place on 27 November 2020 and included inspection activities carried out remotely before and thereafter.

This practice is now rated as Good overall.

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We rated the practice as good for providing safe services because:

  • The provider had made further improvements to systems, practices and processes to help keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse.
  • The provider had taken further effective action to adequately manage risks found at our last inspection in December 2019.
  • Staff had the information they needed to deliver safe care and treatment. Individual care records, including clinical data, were now being written and managed in line with current guidance and relevant legislation.
  • The provider had made further improvements to the arrangements for medicines management to help keep patients safe.
  • The practice learned and made improvements when things went wrong.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective services because:

  • Improvements implemented by the provider had been effective in ensuring that care and treatment were now being delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.
  • The provider had taken effective action to adequately manage and improve performance that, at the time of our inspection in December 2019, fell below local and national averages.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.
  • Staff worked together and with other organisations to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Staff were consistent and proactive in helping patients to live healthier lives.
  • The practice obtained consent to care and treatment in line with legislation and guidance.

We rated the practice as good for providing caring services because:

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • National GP patient survey results demonstrated improvement in patients’ satisfaction scores, all of which were now comparable with local and national averages.
  • The provider had continued to identify patients on the practice list who were also carers to help ensure they were directed to various avenues of support available to them.
  • The practice respected patients’ privacy and dignity.

We rated the practice as good for providing responsive services because:

  • The provider had complied with the conditions issued after the December 2019 inspection and was not delivering regulated activities at the branch surgery. They were in the final stages of making improvements at the branch surgery to help ensure it complied with The Equality Act 2010.
  • Services were organised and delivered to meet patients’ needs.
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment from the practice within an acceptable time frame.
  • The practice had a system to manage complaints and used them to help improve the quality of care.

We rated the practice as good for providing well-led services because:

  • There was compassionate and inclusive leadership at all levels.
  • The practice had a culture of high-quality sustainable care.
  • Improvements to processes and systems supported good governance and management.
  • The practice acted on appropriate and accurate information.
  • The practice involved the public, staff and external partners to improve and sustain high-quality care.
  • There were systems and processes for learning, continuous improvement and innovation.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue with plans to organise practical basic life support for relevant staff as soon as practicable.
  • Continue with plans to schedule diabetes reviews for all housebound patients and activities relating to virtual or physical hypertension reviews for relevant patients.
  • Continue to implement actions to reduce exemption reporting for patients with poor mental health.

I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by this service.

As our inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019 found that the provider had not fully met the Requirement Notices issued after the April 2019 inspection, we imposed conditions on Wigmore Medical Centre’s registration with the Care Quality Commission. The conditions were:

  1. The registered provider must not carry on any regulated activities at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE without the prior consent of the CQC and until such time as the following actions have been carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE:

  1. A fire risk assessment is carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE by a relevantly qualified organisation external to the practice and action has been taken in response to all findings of the fire risk assessment;

  1. Reasonable adjustments are carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE to ensure that the premises comply with The Equality Act 2010.

  1. A patient accessible toilet is installed at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE.

At our inspection on 27 November 2020 we found that the provider was complying fully with these conditions and was not delivering regulated activities from the branch surgery. However, these conditions remain in force as the provider has not yet carried out the necessary activities required to reopen the Hempstead Medical Centre branch surgery.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

3 and 4 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. The overall rating for the practice was Inadequate. The full comprehensive report on the April 2019 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wigmore Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

After our inspection in April 2019 the practice wrote to us with an action plan outlining how they would make the necessary improvements to comply with the regulations.

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow-up inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019. This report covers findings in relation to those requirements.

This practice is now rated as Requires Improvement overall.

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires Improvement

Are services effective? – Requires Improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Inadequate

Are services well-led? – Requires Improvement

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

  • The practice had made improvements to systems, practices and processes to help keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse. However, further improvements were required.
  • The practice had made improvements to the way risks to patients, staff and visitors were being assessed, monitored or managed.
  • Staff had the information they needed to deliver safe care and treatment. However, individual care records, including clinical data, were not always written and managed in line with current guidance and relevant legislation.
  • The practice had made improvements to the arrangements for medicines management to help keep patients safe. However, further improvements were still required.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing effective services because:

  • Care and treatment were not always delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.
  • The practice had carried out improvement activities and exception rates for Quality and Framework Outcomes (QOF) indicators were now in line with or lower than local and national averages. However, improvements to performance for one diabetes indicator and the hypertension indicator were now required.
  • Staff were now up to date with all essential training.
  • Staff were now receiving regular appraisals.

We rated the practice as good for providing caring services because:

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Results of the national GP patient survey had improved in relation to patient satisfaction scores for their overall experience of Wigmore Medical Centre.

We rated the practice as inadequate for providing responsive services because:

  • The limited access for people with mobility issues and the lack of an accessible patient toilet at the branch surgery remained and did not comply with The Equality Act 2010.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing well-led services because:

  • The practice had taken effective action to adequately manage risks found at our last inspection in April 2019. However, further improvements were required.
  • The practice had taken effective action to adequately manage and improve performance that, at the time of our inspection in April 2019, fell below local and national averages. However, improvements to performance for one diabetes indicator and the hypertension indicator were now required.
  • The limited access for people with mobility issues and lack of an accessible patient toilet at the branch surgery remained and had not been effectively managed in a timely manner.
  • Improvements to clinical audit activity was now driving quality improvement to patient care.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure all premises and equipment used by the service provider is fit for use.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to monitor and improve national GP patient survey patient satisfaction scores.

As our inspection on 3 and 4 December 2019 found that the provider had not fully met the Requirement Notices issued after the April 2019 inspection, we imposed conditions on Wigmore Medical Centre’s registration with the Care Quality Commission. The conditions were:

  • The registered provider must not carry on any regulated activities at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE without the prior consent of the CQC and until such time as the following actions have been carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE:

  • A fire risk assessment is carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE by a relevantly qualified organisation external to the practice and action has been taken in response to all findings of the fire risk assessment;

  • Reasonable adjustments are carried out at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE to ensure that the premises comply with The Equality Act 2010.

  • A patient accessible toilet is installed at the branch surgery at Hempstead Medical Centre, 144 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 3QE.

This service was placed in special measures in April 2019. Although improvements have been made these are insufficient such that there remains a rating of inadequate for responsive and all patient population groups. I am placing the service into special measures for a further six months.

Services placed into special measures will be inspected again within six months. If, after re-inspection, the service has failed to make sufficient improvement, and is still rated as inadequate for any population group, key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service.

Special measures will give people who use the service the reassurance that the care they get should improve.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

2, 3 and 8 April 2019

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Inadequate overall.

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Inadequate

Are services effective? – Requires Improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Requires Improvement

Are services well-led? – Inadequate

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 2, 3 and 8 April 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

At this inspection we found:

  • An effective system for reporting and recording significant events had been introduced in March 2019.
  • The practice learned and made improvements when things went wrong.
  • The practice’s systems, processes and practices did not always help to keep people safe.
  • Risks to patients, staff and visitors were not always assessed, monitored and managed in an effective manner. For example, in relation to the arrangements for managing medicines as well as infection prevention and control.
  • Staff had the information they needed to deliver safe care and treatment to patients.
  • Published results showed the childhood immunisation uptake rates for the vaccines given were lower than the minimum target percentage of 90% in one other of the four indicators.
  • Published QOF data from 2017 / 2018 showed that the practice’s exception reporting for some indicators was higher than local and national averages. However, unverified data demonstrated that the practice had taken action and exception reporting to date in the current period being measured had been greatly reduced.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles. However, not all staff were up to date with essential training.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment from the practice within an acceptable timescale for their needs.
  • Where national GP patient survey results were below average the practice was taking action to address some of the findings and improve patient satisfaction.
  • There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management. However, governance arrangements were not always effective.
  • The limited access for people with mobility issues and lack of an accessible patient toilet at the branch surgery had not been effectively managed in a timely manner.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure all premises and equipment used by the service provider is fit for use.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to monitor and improve national GP patient survey patient satisfaction scores.
  • Continue with plans to install a hearing loop at the branch surgery.
  • Continue to identify patients who are also carers to help ensure they are offered appropriate support.

I am placing the service in special measures. Services placed in special measures will be inspected again in six months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of Inadequate for any population group, key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

Special measures will give people who use the service reassurance that the care they get should improve.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

27 May 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wigmore Medical Centre on 27 May 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing well-led, effective, caring, safe and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for the care of older people, people with long term conditions, families, children and young people, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable, people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice