• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Fryent Way Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

22 Fryent Way, London, NW9 9SB

Provided and run by:
Dr Devendra Pravin Patel

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

09 September 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at The Fryent Way Surgery on 09 September 2021. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

Set out the ratings for each key question

Safe - Requires Improvement

Effective - Good

Well-led - Good

Following our previous inspection on 01 August 2019 the practice was rated Requires improvement overall and for the key questions safe and well-led. The key questions effective, caring and responsive were rated good.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Fryent Way Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

This inspection was a focused inspection on the key questions safe, effective and well-led. It was also carried out to follow-up on breaches of Regulation 12 Safe care and treatment and Regulation 17 Good governance.

Why we carried out the inspection

We carried out this focused inspection to follow up on the breaches of Regulation identified at the previous inspection.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm. However, some areas of clinical risk management needed improving.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

We found one breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way.

In addition, the provider should:

  • Continue to improve cervical screening and childhood immunisation performance to bring in line with national targets.
  • Continue to develop the patient participation group to gain feedback from patients and improve the service provided.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

01 August 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Fryent Way Surgery on 1 August 2019. We previously inspected this practice on 28 June 2018. At that inspection we rated the practice as requires improvement overall as we found breaches of Regulations 12, 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act. This inspection on 1 August 2019 was carried out to check if sufficient improvement had been made since the previous inspection and to confirm whether the provider was now meeting the regulations.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as requires improvement overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice’s safety systems and procedures were not all planned in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed did not always promote the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

  • Fire safety, infection control and health and safety arrangements and processes were not effectively managed to ensure patient safety.

We rated this practice as requires improvement for being well-led because:

  • There were deficiencies in the overall governance systems and risk management, for example in relation to fire safety, infection control and health and safety.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective, caring and responsive services because:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review and improve the advertising of and engagement with the patient participation group to support patient involvement and feedback about the running of the practice.
  • Review and improve staff engagement procedures to ensure discussions about complaints and learning from complaints is shared and documented.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care