• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

19-21 Laithes Lane, Barnsley, S71 3AA (01226) 248827

Provided and run by:
Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

The service is a care at home service. At the time of the inspection, 15 people were receiving personal care and support.

Who the service is for

The service supports older people, people who are living with dementia and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment remotely between 21 and 31 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

There was a culture of learning and improvement throughout the service with a focus on identifying and sharing learning from accidents and incidents. Systems and processes ensured people were safe. A member of staff told us, "We keep the people we care for safe by having clear safeguarding policies and making sure staff are well-trained to spot and report any concerns.” People’s needs were assessed appropriately and risks managed and mitigated. There were clear, person-centred care plans in place which reflected people’s choices and preferences. Members of staff were recruited safely and received training and support to deliver safe care to people. Medicines were administered safely and the management team carried out audits of records and spot checks on competencies of members of staff.

People and their families were involved in regular reviews of their care needs. A member of staff told us, “Risks are regularly reviewed and updated as people’s needs change. We balance safety with promoting independence, ensuring people are supported to make informed choices while minimising risks." We saw evidence of improved outcomes for people who received care and support. For example, a person’s family reported improved confidence and independence, better consistency with daily routines, and increased engagement and motivation. People were involved in discussions and decisions about their care. Where people lack capacity to make specific decisions, the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were followed, and best interest decisions made with the involvement of those who knew people well. A member of staff told us, “We involve people by listening to their wishes, preferences and choices and encouraging them to make decisions about their care. We explain what support will be provided, seek their consent before delivering care, and respect their right to refuse. Care is always provided in line with the Mental Capacity Act.”

People were supported to maintain their independence and have choice and control of their care. Feedback from reviews of people’s care highlighted instances where people said staff were kind, respectful and allowed them to maintain their independence. One person appreciated the time members of staff took to listen to their choices and to support them to complete tasks at their own pace.

People’s care was person-centred. Care plans were considered ‘living’ documents and were reviewed regularly, or sooner if people’s needs changed. There were good systems in place to listen to people if they wanted to provide feedback or raised concerns about the service. The provider aimed to remove barriers wherever possible and strived to ensure people could access care and support which promoted dignity, independence, choice and positive outcomes.

The service was well led, and the management team were committed to providing a service where people were treated fairly, regardless of age, disability, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or background. Good governance systems included regular audits of care records, medication, incidents and quality of care, to support continuous service improvement and learning. A member of staff told us, “I am encouraged to share my views, raise concerns and contribute ideas. We are always looking for ways to improve our service through training, feedback and continuous learning. This ensures the people we support receive the highest standard of care."

18 September 2018

During a routine inspection

Compassionate Care Home Care is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes in the community. The location provided the regulated activity in the Barnsley area. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’. This means help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection 20 of the people the service supported were receiving personal care.

The inspection took place on 18 September 2018. To make sure key staff was available to assist in the inspection the registered provider was given short notice of the visit.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered in July 2017. We rated the service as Good.

Everyone we spoke with, without exception, said they were very happy about the service they received from Compassionate Care. They said staff were kind, considerate, respected people and always maintained their dignity.

People told us they felt safe with the staff. They said staff were very rarely late, never missed calls and always stayed the allotted time, ensuring their needs were met. We found staff had good knowledge of how to spot the signs of abuse and of what action to take to protect people. Risks were well managed. Staffing levels were sufficient to make sure people's care and support needs were met safely and the recruitment processes minimised the risk of unsuitable staff being employed.

People received their medicines safely and people who required the involvement of health care professionals were assisted to obtain this support. Where the service supported people with their meals, people’s individual needs and preferences were met. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff told us they enjoyed working for the service and received good support and training.

People received individualised, person centred care that met their needs. People were listened to and felt confident to raise any concerns and complaints. People's privacy and confidentiality were maintained as records were held securely.

The quality monitoring systems and the management structure ensured effective management, review and oversight. A system was in place for checking the quality of the service. People were consulted about the quality of the service and their views were respected and used drive improvement. There was a commitment to continuous learning and improving the service. It was evident that the service worked well in partnership with others to ensure people’s needs were met

Further information is in the detailed findings in the full version of the report.