• Care Home
  • Care home

Ash House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

55 Jardine Crescent, Tile Hill, Coventry, CV4 9UX

Provided and run by:
Lifeways Community Care Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 29 April 20205 to 13 May 2025. Ash House is a residential care home providing accommodation for persons who require personal care and have a diagnosis of a learning disability and/or autism. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements. At the time of our inspection there were 6 people living at Ash House.

This inspection was carried out to follow up on action we told the provider to take at the last inspection when we found they were in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. Some improvements were found at this inspection and the provider was no longer in breach of the regulations.

During this inspection we spoke with people who lived at the service, their relatives, staff, the manager, deputy manager and an area manager. We reviewed care plans, recruitment files, health and safety records and quality assurance records. Following our visit, we sought feedback from other health and social care professionals.

The provider had acted to address issues identified at our last inspection and was no longer in breach of regulations. However, some of these improvements needed to become embedded in staff and management practice to ensure consistency in implementation. Three managers had been appointed since our last inspection of the service, but all had left after short periods of time. The long-term lack of consistency of management at the service meant further improvements were required to ensure the model of care was in line with ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ and people were experiencing the best life possible. Relatives needed more confidence they were respected and listened to by leaders and that their feedback and suggestions were used in developing and evaluating improvement and innovation initiatives. A lack of communication by the provider meant important messages were not shared in a timely way which eroded confidence in their leadership.

Staff described improvements in the culture of the service that had a positive impact on the quality of care provided. However, some staff felt there were further improvements required to promote good teamwork and build a cohesive workforce that reflected the provider’s policies on inclusion and diversity.

Health and social care professionals told us whilst staff were appreciative of their guidance, they did not always work well together. They were not always confident advice shared with managers was communicated to the care team.

Risks to people’s health and wellbeing were identified and mitigated against and there was a process in place to manage and respond to accidents and incidents. People received their medicine in a safe way.

Staff received training to ensure they were competent to provide safe care and understood their role in protecting people from abuse and discrimination. Staff treated people as individuals, respected their privacy and dignity and understood the importance of giving people opportunities to make choices.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment 17 April and 26 April 2024.

Ash House is a residential care home providing accommodation for persons who require personal care and have a diagnosis of a learning disability and/or autism. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements.

This assessment was brought forward due to information of concern about the management of risks related to people's health, safeguarding and good governance. This assessment only examined those risks and assessed 11 quality statements which included the provider's learning culture, safeguarding, involving people to manage risk, safe and effective staffing, medicines optimisation, person centred care, shared direction and culture, capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders, governance and assurance, partnerships and communities and learning, improvement and innovation. We will assess the other quality statements in future assessments.

We found 2 breaches of the regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Risks related to people’s care were not always managed well. Accidents and incidents were not managed effectively. The provider's systems and processes had failed to identify, manage and mitigate some areas of risk. Audits and checks were not always effective in ensuring continuous improvement. There had been a period of instability of leadership within the home and at the time of our assessment.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

18 February 2020

During a routine inspection

About the service

Ash House is a residential care home providing personal care and accommodation for younger people with learning disabilities. The service was a large domestic style property registered to support up to six people. Four people were using the service during our visit.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures people who use the service

can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and

independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported

this practice.

Relatives felt their family members were safe living at Ash House and procedures were in place to protect people from harm. Risks associated with people's care and support were assessed and staff knew how to manage risks to keep people safe.

Staff were recruited safely, and enough staff were on duty to meet people's needs in a timely way. Recruiting new staff was one of the registered managers main priorities.

The management of people’s medicines was safe, and people received their medicines when they needed them. People had access to health professionals when needed and the staff team worked in partnership with health and social care professionals to ensure people received the care they needed to remain well.

People received responsive and personalised care from staff who knew them well. Staff cared about people and interactions between people and staff were positive. The culture of the home was friendly and inclusive and people-maintained relationships that were important to them. People took a part in a range of social activities in line with their wishes.

People's needs had been assessed before they moved into the home and their care records contained detailed information which helped staff to provide personalised care. Regular reviews of people's care took place and relatives felt included in making decisions when appropriate.

Relatives had confidence in the ability of staff to provide effective care. Staff spoke positively about the ongoing training they received, and they had the knowledge and skills to meet people's needs.

People were encouraged to eat nutritionally balanced meals to maintain their health. Where possible people were involved in weekly menu planning.

People and relatives knew how to raise complaints any complaints received were investigated in line with the provider's procedure. The staff team demonstrated commitment to learning lessons where things went wrong to improve outcomes for people.

The environment was clean and tidy during our visit and met people’s needs. People’s bedrooms were personalised. A variety of communal areas and a large rear garden offered people choices of where to spend their time.

People knew the registered manager. Staff felt supported and told us the service was well led. Feedback from people and their relatives was welcomed and listened to. Effective quality assurance processes were embedded and completed audits and checks demonstrated good governance.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 20/02/2019 and this is the first inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.