• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Stratford House Surgery

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

578 Stratford Road, Sparkhill, Birmingham, West Midlands, B11 4AN 0345 245 0765

Provided and run by:
Stratford House Surgery

All Inspections

7 September 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow up inspection at Stratford House Surgery on 7 September 2016. The practice was formerly known as Sparkhill Surgery until 1 August 2016 when it merged with Midlands Medical Partnership (MMP). The practice is in the process of merging and making these changes to their CQC registration.

Sparkhill Surgery was previously inspected on 3 December 2015 and placed into special measures following an inadequate rating. We found the provider to be in breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The regulations breached were:

Regulation 12: Safe care and treatment

Regulation 16: Receiving and acting on complaints

Regulation 17: Good governance

Enforcement action was taken and a notice was served placing conditions on the original providers registration.

At this inspection we found the practice had made sufficient improvements. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Systems for managing patient safety had been reviewed since our previous inspection and effective systems put in place to manage risks identified. We saw significant improvements, specifically in relation to the management of medicines and infection control.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. We saw improvements in the management of patients with long term conditions.
  • Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. The skills needed to deliver care and treatment had been reviewed and where needed training put in place.
  • Feedback we received from patient comment cards about care and treatment was positive. However, results from the latest GP national patient survey found patient satisfaction scores for consultations, involvement in care and decisions about treatment were below CCG and national averages.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Complaints were monitored and learning shared.
  • Patients frequently found it difficult to make an appointment, we saw action had been taken but these had yet to clearly show improvements in patient satisfaction.
  • The practice was accessible to patients and we saw improvements in the facilities available since our previous inspection.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by the new management structures of MMP.
  • The practice had re-launched the patient participation group and had proactively sought feedback in delivering service improvements.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure systems and processes recently implemented for improving patient care and outcomes are fully embedded within the practice and sustained in the long term.
  • Review systems for managing uncollected prescriptions and for maintaining accurate records of hand written prescription pads so that it is clear if any are missing.
  • Ensure risk assessments are fully completed to mitigate against all potential risks and that actions have been reviewed for completion.
  • Continue to improve the working arrangements with health and social care professionals in order to deliver a multi-disciplinary package of care to those with complex care needs.
  • Identify systems for recording verbal complaints to support the identification of themes or trends and for service improvement.

I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by this service. However, we are aware that the provider is in the process of setting up a new registration with Midlands Medical Partnership (MMP).

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

3 December 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Sparkhill Surgery on 3 December 2015. Overall the practice is rated as inadequate.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Patients were at risk of harm and poor outcomes because systems and processes were not in place to keep them safe and ensure they received the care they needed.

  • Patients with long term conditions or repeat medicines did not always receive regular reviews. Nationally published data showed patient outcomes were low for many long term conditions.

  • Robust systems were not in place to ensure effective multi-disciplinary team working took place so that the needs of some of the most vulnerable patients were understood and met.

  • A large backlog in the processing of patient information meant there was a risk of important information about patient care being missed. Following our inspection the practice advised us they had worked with the local Clinical Commissioning Group to cleared this backlog.

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. These were investigated and learning shared with staff.

  • Feedback from patients about the service they received was mixed. The national patient survey rated the service in most areas below the national and CCG average. Patients found it difficult to access appointments and often experienced long waits to be seen.

  • Governance arrangements provided a forum for important information to be shared with staff. However, we found that the practice did not manage all risks well for example those relating to infection control and unforeseen events. In the absence of the practice manager staff were also unable to find key policies and procedures when needed.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure patients receive care and treatment that is appropriate to their needs and keeps them safe and has regard to current best practice guidance.

  • Ensure that the patient information received is processed and acted on in a timely way.

  • Establish effective working arrangements with other health and social care professionals in order to deliver a multi-disciplinary package of care to those with complex care needs.

  • Establish effective systems for managing and mitigating risks to the service, for example unforeseen events and in relation to infection control.

  • For relevant staff, establish effective systems for monitoring staff registration with their professional bodies to ensure it is kept up to date.

  • Ensure patients are aware of the practice's complaints process so that they know how to raise their concerns.

  • Review feedback received from patients such as the national GP patient survey to identify how patient access to services could be improved.

  • Register the regulated activity of ‘Maternity and Midwifery Services’ with the Care Quality Commission.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure effective cleaning schedules are in place for the medicines refrigerators to avoid the build up of frost.

  • Ensure fire drills are routinely carried out so staff know what to do in the event of a fire.

  • Maintain robust records for recording staff training to ensure staff are up to date.

  • Support patients to understand and access the choose and book system.

  • Provide suitable arrangements to enable patients to discuss sensitive or other matters in private away from the reception area.

  • Ensure appropriate support and signposting is given to carers.

I am placing this practice in special measures. Practices placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. If insufficient improvements have been made so a rating of inadequate remains for any population group, key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. A notice has been served on this provider placing conditions on their registration which they must comply with. The conditions are the first two 'Must Improve' comments listed above.

The practice will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service.

Special measures will give people who use the practice the reassurance that the care they get should improve.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice