• Doctor
  • GP practice

Churchill Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Churchill Terrace, Chingford, London, E4 8DA (020) 8430 7020

Provided and run by:
Churchill Medical Centre

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 13 April 2026

Date of Assessment: 28 April 2026. Churchill Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 13,800 people under a contract held with NHS England. The practice has a branch surgery at Ching Way Medical Centre. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 58.4% White, 14.2% Asian, 6.5% Mixed, 14.2% Black and 6.8% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the fifth decile (5 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

We undertook this focused assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. The assessment did not contain a review of clinical records. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. However, the service was not fully compliant with the required recruitment checks and, there was not always a full immunisation history, or risk assessment, of staff vaccinations against potential healthcare acquired infections.

Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes.

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity.

The service demonstrated efforts to ensure patients could access timely care and treatment when they needed it. Data from the GP Patient Survey showed people mostly had a positive patient experience.Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.

The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

People's experience of the service

Updated 13 April 2026

The national GP Patient Survey (GPPS) conducted between December 2024 and April 2025 showed the practice was above the local and national average relating to patient’s experience of the service. There were 490 GP Patient Surveys were sent out, and 115 surveys were received (23% completion rate). People rated their overall experience of the service as good (88% of respondents) compared with the ICS average: 70% and National average: 75%.

The GPPS results showed 57% found it easy to contact this GP practice usingthe NHS App (ICS average: 45% National average: 49%). However, only 37% patients found it easy contacting the practice using their website (ICS average: 47% National average: 51%).

The provider highlighted positive feedback from their Friends and Family Test (FFT) and Google reviews. While this internal feedback was noted, the national GP Patient Survey is a validated, benchmarked tool designed to provide a representative picture of a practice's patient population. Leaders shared FFT results from December 2025 (112 responses) showed generally positive feedback, with most patients rating the service as very good (81) or good (25). Comments highlighted short waiting times and helpful, supportive staff. At the time of this assessment, leaders explained there was no active patient participation group and staff were actively engaged in reconvening the PPG to help shape the future of the practice.