• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Sanctuary Supported Living (Tees Valley Care Services)

Ashfield Court, East Raby Street, Darlington, County Durham, DL3 7TR

Provided and run by:
Sanctuary Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 November 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was a follow up visit to the service as at a previous visit in May 2013 we found care plans, risk assessments and the quality monitoring process were not up to standard.

On this visit we saw that a new system of support plans, risk assessments and keyworker records had been implemented. People's needs and risks were clearly documented and reviewed and we saw that people who used the service were involved in their plans. One person told us; 'I've read my support plan and had a review'.

We a saw that a quality audit system had been put in place to check that support plans and assessments were in place and reviewed.

29 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People who used the service were very positive in their comments about the staff from Sanctuary Supported Living (Tees Valley Care Services). We spoke with three people during the course of the visit who lived in two separate properties across Darlington and they said;

'I would talk to my support workers if I was worried about anything. They always ask if things are ok' and 'I've just been out for a bike ride with my support worker and we also play badminton'.

We looked at staff recruitment and found that the organisation had a policy and procedure in place for making sure there were checks carried out on people applying to work at the service. Staff members were positive about their induction process.

We found that support plans and risk assessments for people were not reviewed regularly and in some cases information about peoples needs was not recorded. This could mean that care or support was not provided in the way that it should be, and people and staff could be at risk. Because records were not reviewed regularly this meant that the quality assurance process for the service was not good enough.