We carried out a focused inspection at Dr Saira Zaman on 4 December 2019. The announced inspection was part of our inspection programme. Following a Care Quality Commission annual regulatory review to check for changes in quality we inspected the key questions effective, caring and well led. We used information from our previous inspection findings for the key questions safe and responsive. The practice was previously inspected on 26 January 2016 and was rated good overall.
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- What we found when we inspected,
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services
- and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations
We have rated this practice as outstanding overall
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
- Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
We rated the practice as good for providing effective services and good for the population groups because:
- The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided.
- It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
- The practice understood the needs of its population and tailored services in response to those needs.
We rated the practice as outstanding for providing caring services because:
- The practice adopted a holistic approach to caring by addressing all the needs of the patient, including their physical, mental, and emotional health, while taking social factors into consideration. The practice had worked with patients who were socially isolated, and also provided good support for carers. The practice had identified over 5% of the patient population as carers.
- Feedback from patients was consistently positive. There were 41 CQC comment cards completed and all had very positive comments about how caring the staff were and they were always treated with dignity and respect.
- The results from the National Patient Survey were consistently high and the practice results were the best in the CCG footprint and were higher than the national averages.
- There was a strong person-centred culture.
- Staff treated patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- Patients were truly respected and valued as individuals and were empowered as partners in their care, practically and emotionally, by an exceptional and distinctive service.
- There were many illustrations of the practice team “going the extra mile” to help the more vulnerable patients. For example, providing patients with complex medical needs with emotional support and facilitating them to attend appropriate services or providing care and treatment at home subject to the care and needs of the patient.
We rated the practice as outstanding for providing well-led services because:
- The practice management team were inspirational, progressive, cohesive and innovative with a mature approach and clear purpose. The practice management team were truly compassionate and caring. Quality and integrity were at the heart of what they did resulting in an exceptional caring culture within a strong practice.
- The practice demonstrated strong clinical and administrative leadership and worked on a “whole team” approach. They shared their outstanding initiatives and practices with other local practices and across the CCG footprint.
- There were many opportunities provided for staff for personal and professional development, and staff had protected time for this. The practice valued their staff and provided professional and personal support for them which created a positive working environment.
- Leaders at the practice had an inspiring shared purpose that motivated staff to succeed.
- There were high levels of staff satisfaction and spoke with pride about the culture and constructive engagement.
- The leadership, governance and culture were used to drive and improve the delivery of high-quality person-centred care.
- There was strong collaboration across all staff and a common focus on engaging with patients and other services to improve quality of care and the patient experience. The practice routinely involved staff and patients to gather views and facilitate improvement.
- The practice embraced social prescribing for the community to ensure patients received timely intervention when they needed it most, signposted them to services that could help them and ensured support was offered locally so the patient population could easily attend appointments.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care