• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

KMX Nursing Agency

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

C P L House, Ivy Arch Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN14 8BX (01903) 910035

Provided and run by:
KMX Care Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 23 July 2025

Dates of assessment: 25 July to 8 August 2025. KMX Nursing Agency is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes or within a supported living setting. KMX provides support for people with a learning disability and/or autistic people, some people also live with physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection 12 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care including 3 people within the supported living settings.

We inspected the service against ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the provider was meeting the values of ‘Right support, right care, right culture.’

Improvements had been made to the accessibility of care related records. The provider was now using an electronic care management system which allowed staff to access all appropriate documentation. People and/or their relatives were involved as much as possible in formulating their support plans and risk assessments. People were enabled to take positive risks which managers assessed to enhance their safety. People were supported to go out to work, college and attend places that interested them.

The management team’s quality assurance system was effective in most areas; however, improvements were needed to ensure records remained consistent. Relatives, staff and professionals spoke highly of the management team’s visibility and openness. The provider now had full oversight and systems to monitor and analyse incidents and accidents.

Staff were recruited safely, trained and supervised to provide appropriate support for people. Staff demonstrated skills and aptitude to ensure people were receiving care in line with their needs. People’s medicines were managed safely by trained staff. Staff understood their duty and role in safeguarding people from the risk of harm or abuse.

People were supported to live healthy lives and their overall wellbeing was a priority for the provider. Staff and managers monitored people’s health and wellbeing outcomes and sought professional advice where concerns were identified. Professional involvement and instructions were documented in people’s care records for staff to follow.

Staff and managers were skilled, trained and aware how to understand and respond to challenges and barriers to care people may face. The management team enlisted support from professionals to respond to incidents and promote positive outcomes for people.

People received person-centred care by staff who treated them with dignity and respect. People’s relatives commented on their kind and caring approach. Staff told us they were happy working at the service and felt valued by the management team.

There was an open culture at the service, people were able to feedback and make changes to their support. Professionals told us staff and managers worked collaboratively with them and appropriately shared concerns. Staff were consulted and kept informed of changes in people and within the service.

At the last inspection the provider was not displaying their CQC rating on the website as required but this has been rectified.

People's experience of the service

Updated 23 July 2025

People received care and support that was tailored to their individual needs, enabling them to have choice, control and independence in their daily lives, in line with the principles of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture. We were unable to obtain people’s direct views of their experiences. However, we spoke with people’s relatives and professionals who were involved in their care. We also reviewed feedback that people had provided to the service.

People’s relatives provided positive feedback about the staff and the support their family members received. Their comments included, “[Person] is more than happy with them, I am too.” And, “They are flexible, I have met a few staff they are usually the same, they change over quite frequently but are all lovely. We have asked for female staff always and they send females only.”

A relative told us about how staff supported their family member and said, “I work with them (staff) and work with them daily, I want them to follow my guidelines. [Staff member] follows instructions and is very good and communicative. I have no hesitation in explaining what they need to do and why they need to do it. They’re receptive to what I suggest, they make suggestions too.”

Relatives told us staff were well trained and supported them in accordance with their family members needs and wishes and escalated any concerns. A relative commented, “Anything they find like an overgrown nail they bring to our attention; they do pass things over to us.” And, “We are satisfied they are able to service [person’s] needs; any issues [person] would have more reservations about going out with staff.”

Relatives told us the difference it had made to their family lives since the service commenced. They told us, “We have a busy household, KMX are essential and doing a good job, everyone is working together, the resources (other services) are in short supply at the moment.” Another said, “We have more quality time with [person] as they (staff) are helping.”