• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Alexandra Court Care Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

340 Southcoates Lane, Hull, North Humberside, HU9 3TR (01482) 376702

Provided and run by:
Prestige Care (Humberside) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

10 and 11 November 2014

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection was carried out on 10 and 11 November 2014. The last inspection was completed on 3 December 2013; the service was compliant with all of the regulations that were inspected.

Alexandra court is registered to provide care, including nursing care, and accommodation for up to 84 older people who may have a dementia related condition. It has three floors that are connected by a passenger lift. It is close to local amenities and has good access to public transport.

A registered manager had been in place since the home opened in December 2012. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who lived at the home were safe. Care workers had been trained to recognise the signs of potential abuse and knew what actions to take if they suspected abuse had occurred.

People had their health and social care need’s met my sufficient numbers of appropriately trained staff. Training was completed on an annual basis to ensure staff worked in line with best practice guidance. We saw evidence to confirm that staff had been recruited safely.

Care workers were supported effectively by the registered manager. One to one meetings were held periodically and handover meetings took place daily to ensure staff were aware of their responsibilities.

We observed care workers gaining people’s consent before care and treatment was provided. When people lacked the capacity to make informed decisions themselves, best interest meetings were held appropriately.

Care workers we spoke with could describe people’s care needs and how they preferred to be supported. We saw evidence that other healthcare professionals were contacted as required when people’s health deteriorated including GPs, speech and language therapists, Huntingdon’s disease nurses, social workers and the falls team.

Resident and relative meetings were held regularly and used as a forum for people to raise concerns, ask questions or make suggestions about the overall running of the service. When suggestions were made they were implemented by the registered manager.

An audit schedule was in place that helped drive the continuous improvement of the service. The registered manager took appropriate action when issues were highlighted through audits, ‘customer satisfaction’ surveys and complaints.

3 December 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook this inspection to see what action the provider had taken to address the compliance action set following the last inspection during May 2013 with regard to the safe handling of medication. We found the provider had taken action and put systems in place to comply with the regulation.

We did not speak to any of the people who used the service during this inspection.

21 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We found that people were involved with the running of the home and their care and treatment. People told us, “I have no complaints – if I did I would see the manager”, “I am quite happy and satisfied with things”, “My letters are delivered unopened”, “There are residents meetings but I don’t go”, “It’s very difficult to see how they could improve the home”, “The manager comes and sees us frequently” and “The staff are kind. I have no complaints.”

We found that information was available for staff to follow as to how to care for the people who used the service. People told us, “It’s a very good home. The staff are smashing”, “They get the doctor when needed in a flash” and “The district nurse comes in to see me to dress my leg.”

People were not protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider did not have appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines.

We found there were enough qualified staff on duty to meet people’s needs and they had received training about the needs of the people they cared for. People told us “The staff are pretty good. I am looked after well.” Staff told us they felt the training they received equipped them to care for the people who used the service.