• Doctor
  • GP practice

Nova Scotia Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

22a, Leeds Road, Allerton Bywater, Castleford, West Yorkshire, WF10 2DP (01977) 552193

Provided and run by:
Dr Vishal Kapoor

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 8 May to 13 May 2026. Nova Scotia Medical Centre is located at 22a Leeds Road, Allerton Bywater, Castleford, West Yorkshire, WF10 2DP. The practice serves a population of approximately 6,000 patients and is a member of the NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB). The practice provides services under the terms of a Personal Medical Services (PMS) contract and is part of the LS25/26 Primary Care Network (PCN).

The provider is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to deliver the Regulated Activities: diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning, maternity and midwifery services, treatment of disease, disorder or injury and surgical procedures.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population is in the sixth decile (6 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others.

According to the latest available data, the ethnic makeup of the practice area is 96.4% white, 1.1% Asian with the remaining 2.5% being Black, Mixed and other non-white backgrounds.

The practice was previously inspected in January 2019 and was rated good overall and in all key questions. We carried out this focused assessment in response to information of concern received by CQC and due to the length of time since our last inspection. We assessed 13 quality statements across the key questions safe, effective, caring and well-led.

Safe: The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks were mitigated. There were enough staff, with the right skills. We saw evidence of appraisals being carried out for some staff members. However, some staff told us they had not received an appraisal within the last 12 months.

Effective: Staff regularly reviewed people’s care and worked with other services to achieve this. However, the provider had not been able to meet expected outcomes for all childhood immunisations and cancer screening.

Caring: People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

Well Led: Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and leaders worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care. However, we identified issues in respect of the culture within the practice. During our assessment we received mixed feedback from staff members regarding interactions with leaders. We also identified issues with governance systems.

3 January 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Nova Scotia Medical Centre on 3 January 2019, as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services, and
  • information from the provider, patients, public, other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs, which were delivered in line with current best practice guidance.
  • Staff treated patients with kindness and respect, involving them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients’ comments were positive about practice staff and the care they received.
  • The practice organised and delivered services responsively and effectively. They addressed any challenges they encountered and engaged patients and staff in any changes to service delivery.
  • The leadership, governance and culture of the practice promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

We saw the following areas of outstanding practice:

  • The GP had developed a template to support GP referrals to secondary care. The template populated information direct from a patient’s record into a letter which could be emailed directly to the appropriate consultant. Information incorporated included a summary of the issue, any active problems, current and repeat medication and details of any allergies the patient may have. We were informed that this template was being used citywide.
  • The GP had developed a search tool used to identify vulnerable young adults. The tool identified younger patients who may not have ordinarily been identified using conventional tools. This allowed staff to be aware of any ‘vulnerable’ issues, such as being reliant on a family member to take them out.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Improve the recording of the immunisation status of staff with regards to occupational health vaccinations they had received.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence table.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPG FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice