Marion House

Updated 4 February 2022

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of CQC’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic we are looking at how services manage infection control and visiting arrangements. This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection prevention and control measures the provider had in place. We also asked the provider about any staffing pressures the service was experiencing and whether this was having an impact on the service.

This inspection took place on 18 January 2022 and was announced. We gave the service 24 hours notice of the inspection.

Updated 4 February 2022

About the service:

Marion House is a care home, which provides accommodation and personal care to people with autistic spectrum conditions, who may have behaviours that challenge and associated complex needs. The home was registered for five people. At the time of our inspection, two people were using the service. The people we met, had complex needs and were not able to share their views with us verbally. We therefore observed how care was delivered and discussed this with staff, relatives and professionals to help inform our judgements.

The accommodation was over three floors. The ground floor had one bedroom and communal areas, including a lounge, dining room and conservatory. On the first floor, there were further bedrooms and on the second floor a self-contained apartment. Outside there was a large, secure garden area and an interactive sensory activities room.

People’s experience of using this service:

There was a friendly, homely and welcoming atmosphere for people using the service.

People received safe care from staff who knew them well. Potential risks to people’s health, safety and well-being had been assessed to help keep people safe. There were suitable arrangements for the safe storage, management and disposal of medicines and people were supported to take their medicines by trained staff. There were systems in place to help promote infection control and lessons were learned when things went wrong.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support in the following ways. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People had a say in how the service was run by accessing regular meetings, where tailored support was offered to maximise input from people using the service. Information was in a range of formats including visual and audio communication devices to support people’s voices to be heard. People’s views were considered and had been used to make changes to activities, the environment and the menu.

People’s diverse needs had been assessed and care was personalised to meet their desired outcomes. A range of activities were on offer which reflected people’s interests. People had regular staff giving care and positive relationships had been developed. People enjoyed the attention and interaction with staff members. Staff respected and promoted people’s dignity and made sure they supported them in the way they wished, whilst encouraging them to be as independent as possible. There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs and staff recruitment practices were satisfactory.

The service was managed in a responsive way to support people’s changing needs. The registered manager was visible and accessible. There was a management structure in place which gave clear lines of responsibility and accountability. A range of checks were in place to raise standards and drive improvements within the home. This is one of a number of locations the provider operated nationally and systems had been developed and shared across their locations to support learning and quality improvements.

Partnerships had been developed with the community and health and social care professionals. When people had been unwell, staff had raised the concern and involved health professionals to address their health care needs.

When required, notifications had been completed to inform us of events and incidents, this helped us to monitor any actions the service had taken. Good governance processes were in place, alongside comprehensive auditing checks, including management of any complaints, to ensure quality care was delivered.

Further details and information can be found in the full report.

Rating at the last inspection: This was the first inspection for Marion House since their registration with Care Quality Commission in April 2018.

Why we inspected:

This was a planned full comprehensive inspection to ensure the service was meeting the regulations of the Health and Social Care Act and CQC. We found the service to be Good.

Follow up:

We will continue with ongoing monitoring as per our re-inspection programme and if any concerning information received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk