• Doctor
  • GP practice

Dr Joann Amin Also known as The Willows Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Willows, Lords Avenue, Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 5JR (0161) 736 2356

Provided and run by:
Dr Joann Amin

All Inspections

27 June 2023

During a routine inspection

We previously carried out an announced inspection at Dr Joann Amin on 22 July 2022. At that earlier inspection, the practice was rated as requires improvement with the following key question ratings:

Safe - requires improvement

Effective – requires improvement

Caring – good (rating awarded at the inspection 24 May 2016)

Responsive – good (rating awarded at the inspection 24 May 2016)

Well-led – requires improvement

We found breaches of Regulation 17 (Good governance) and 19 (Fit and proper persons employed).

At this inspection, on 27 June 2023, we found improvements had been made to the service, but further improvement was required. We have rated the practice as good overall; the key questions of safe, caring, responsive and well led are rated as good. We have rated effective as requires improvement. We found a breach of Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment).

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr Joann Amin on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out a full comprehensive inspection in response to risk as the last inspection rated the practice as requires improvement overall.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews remotely.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.
  • Gaining feedback from staff by using staff questionnaires.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice good overall.

We rated the practice good for providing safe services:

  • Recruitment checks were carried out in accordance with regulations.
  • The system for receiving and acting on safety alerts was effective.

We rated the practice requires improvement for providing effective services:

  • Dementia care plans were not effective.
  • Patients with long-term conditions were not always effectively monitored.
  • The practice did not consistently record repeated consent to care and treatment in line with legislation and guidance.

We rated the practice good for providing caring services:

  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.

We rated the practice good for providing responsive services:

  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.

We rated the practice good for providing well-led services:

  • Governance and assurance systems had improved since our last inspection.

We found a breach of regulation. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

The provider should:

  • Continue efforts to improve the take up of childhood immunisations and cervical screening programmes.
  • Undertake a review of the approach to the recording and review of Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decision making and recording and be assured that an appropriate policy is in line with current practice guidelines.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

22 July 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Dr Joann Amin on 22 July 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Safe - requires improvement

Effective – requires improvement

Caring – good (rating awarded at the inspection 24 May 2016)

Responsive – good (rating awarded at the inspection 24 May 2016)

Well-led – requires improvement

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr Joann Amin on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection/review (delete as appropriate)

We undertook this inspection as part of a random selection of services rated Good and Outstanding to test the reliability of our new monitoring approach. This inspection was a focused inspection looking at the key questions Safe, Effective and Well-led.

How we carried out the inspection/review

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews remotely and on site.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records remotely to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit
  • Gaining feedback from staff by using staff questionnaires.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We found that:

Following this inspection, we have rated the practice requires improvement for providing safe services. We identified the following areas of concern:

  • Recruitment checks were not always carried out in accordance with regulations.
  • The practice did not hold appropriate emergency medicines, have risk assessments in place to determine the range of medicines held, or an effective system in place to monitor stock levels and expiry dates.

Following this inspection, we have rated the practice requires improvement for providing effective services. We identified the following areas of concern:

  • The practice was unable to demonstrate that some clinical staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.

Following this inspection, we have rated the practice requires improvement for providing well-led services. We identified the following areas of concern:

  • The practice had not identified the actions necessary to address challenges to quality and sustainable care.
  • The practice did not always have clear and effective processes for managing risks, issues and performance.
  • Some governance and assurance systems were not effective.
  • There were limited systems and processes for learning, continuous improvement and innovation.

We found two breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed. Ensure where appropriate, persons employed are registered with the relevant professional body.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The provider should:

  • Involve staff in the development of the vision, values and strategy of the practice.
  • Continue to establish a patient participation group.
  • Establish a quality improvement programme.
  • Ensure clinical staff receive copies of practice meeting minutes when they cannot attend.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

24 May 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Willows Surgery on 24 May 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Review the process for disseminating NICE and MHRA alerts and ensure all staff keep up to date with these.
  • Review staff awareness on the importance of keeping computers locked and the importance of removing smart cards.
  • Review the location of the storage of blank prescription pads.
  • Assess the need for the practice to have a spillage kit on site.
  • Monitor the vaccines fridge to ensure the temperature is not going out of range and take advice from the medicines management team if required.
  • Provide formal chaperone training to staff members performing this role.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice