• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Dr Shiba Hameed

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Heathfield Surgery, 39 Heathfield Road, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 1EZ (020) 8681 7286

Provided and run by:
Dr Shiba Hameed

All Inspections

15 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Shiba Hameed / Heathfield Surgery on 25 October 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement with requires improvement for safe, effective, caring and well-led. The full comprehensive report on the October 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr Shiba Hameed on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This announced comprehensive inspection was undertaken on 15 June 2017. The provider had made improvements in most of the areas where issues were identified in the inspection in October 2016, in particular in safe. However there were still improvements to be made and the practice remains rated as requires improvement for effective, caring and well-led.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. We reviewed a sample of patient records and found that the care was delivered in line with current evidence based guidance. However the data
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice offered a daily GP led telephone triage. The patients were put on a telephone triage list when they called for an appointment and the duty GP called and spoke to patients and they were provided same day or urgent appointments as required. The practice had recently started offering longer GP sessions which they said had reduced their appointment waiting times.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • T he lead GP was new and settling into their role which meant they were developing the leadership within the practice.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on. The practice had recently re-established its Patient Participation Group and sought feedback from patients through this.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Ensure that all patients’ needs are identified and care and treatment is provided to meet their needs.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review practice procedures to ensure the uptake of cervical screening, childhood immunisations and breast and bowel cancer screening are improved.
  • Consider undertaking internal clinical meetings on a regular basis.
  • Consider increasing the provision of GP sessions.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

25 October 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Shiba Hameed/HeathfieldSurgery on 25 October 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Risks to patients were not always assessed and well managed; the practice had no defibrillator or medical oxygen to respond to medical emergencies and that many staff had not undertaken mandatory training including safeguarding, basic life support, infection control, information governance and fire safety training. Also there were gaps in monitoring of refrigerator temperatures in which vaccines were stored and not all staff who acted as chaperones were trained for the role or had received a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS check).
  • There was an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. However there was no robust system in place to keep all clinical staff up to date.
  • The practice had a low uptake of cervical screening.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

There were areas of practice where the provider must make improvements:

  • Ensure all staff have child protection training, annual basic life support training, safeguarding vulnerable adults training, mental capacity act training, fire safety training, infection control training and information governance training relevant to their role; ensure that temperatures are regularly monitored for refrigerators that store vaccines; ensure that the chaperone processes are in line with guidelines and that staff have been trained and undertake a risk assessment to ascertain if DBS checks are required for all staff who undertake this role.
  • Ensure that the Quality and Outcomes Framework results are improved especially for patients with diabetes.
  • Ensure that a system to seek and act on feedback from service users is reinstated, including re-establishing a Patient Participation Group (PPG).

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Review practice procedures to ensure that the practice has a defibrillator and medical oxygen available to respond to medical emergencies or to have completed a risk assessment identifying how they would deal with medical emergencies.
  • Review practice procedures to ensure that fire and health and safety of the premises risk assessments are undertaken and all the recommendations from the fire, premises and legionella risk assessments are actioned.
  • Review systems in place to ensure all patients are monitored and reviewed as required dependent upon their medical condition. For example annual health reviews for all patients with a learning disability.
  • Review practice procedures to improve uptake of cervical screening.
  • Review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is made available to them.
  • Review practice procedures to ensure that GP survey results are reviewed to address low scoring areas to improve patient satisfaction.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

29 January 2014

During a routine inspection

During the inspection we spoke with the registered manager, they were a General Practitioner (GP) at the practice. We also spoke with the practice manager, a nurse practitioner, a receptionist and three people using the service.

People using the service said the GP's were very understanding and listened to what they had to say. They always had time with the GP or the nurse practitioner to go through their health issues and discuss and agree appropriate treatment options. One person said 'This is a good practice. The GP's are very proactive, they make sure I get things sorted out. Everyone is helpful. The GP gave me very good advice today about medications which I found very informative'. Another person said 'I usually come here with my daughter. If I need an appointment quickly they always make sure I get one. That's quite reassuring'.

We saw that the practice had safeguarding policies that related to adults and children. We saw the practice was clean and well maintained throughout. We saw that the practice had effective systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.