• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: The Hollies

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Cardinal Gardens, Burghwallis, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN6 9FN (01302) 338826

Provided and run by:
First 4 Care Limited

All Inspections

1 December 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 1 December 2015 and was announced, 48 hours’ notice of the inspection was given because the service is small and we needed to be sure that the registered manager was available and that people who used the service would be in. At the last inspection in August 2014 the service was judged compliant with the regulations inspected.

The Hollies is a small care home for people with learning difficulties. The property is built to a high specification and bedrooms are spacious and decorated to each person’s tastes. It is situated in the village of Burghwallis, near Doncaster. There are good transport links into Doncaster. It can accommodate up to four people. At the time of this inspection there were two people living at the service.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People we spoke with told us they felt safe while staying at the home. One person said, “I like living here and I like the staff.” Staff had a clear understanding of potential abuse, which helped them recognise how they would deal with situations if they arose.

There were enough skilled and experienced staff and there was a programme of training, supervision and appraisal to support staff to meet people’s needs. Procedures in relation to

recruitment and retention of staff were robust and ensured only suitable people were employed in the service.

Medicines were stored and administered safely. Staff and people that used the service were aware of what medicines to be taken and when.

Staff were aware of the Mental Capacity Act and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. At the time of this inspection the registered manager told us they had not found it necessary to use the safeguards. This legislation is used to protect people who might not be able to make informed decisions on their own.

People were encouraged to make decisions about meals, and were supported to go shopping and be involved in menu planning. We saw people were involved and consulted about all aspects of their care and support, where they were able, including suggestions for activities and holidays.

People had access to a wide range of activities that were provided both in-house and in the community. This included walking groups and socialising at discos and meals to pubs for lunch and evening meals.

We observed good interactions between staff and people who used the service. People were happy to discuss the day’s events and people told us they were looking forward to Christmas and all of the festive parties that they would be attending.

People told us they were aware of the complaints procedure and said staff would assist them if they needed to use it.

There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided. We saw copies of reports produced by the registered manager. The reports included any actions required and these were checked each month to determine progress.

7 August 2014

During a routine inspection

At this inspection we set out to answer our five questions; Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, discussions with five people using the service, three relatives, and the staff supporting them and looking at records.

If you wish to see the evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

People were consulted about their care and staff acted in accordance of their wishes.

Systems were in place to make sure that the manager and staff learn from events such as accidents and incidents, complaints, and concerns. This reduces the risks to people and helps the service to continually improve.

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines.

Is the service effective?

People's health and care needs were assessed with them, and they were involved in writing their plans of care. The plans were person centred and health and welfare plans were in place. People told us that they felt staff supported them to be as independent as possible.

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff. We saw staff engaging with people in a positive manner.

People's preferences, interests, aspirations and diverse needs had been recorded and care and support had been provided in accordance with people's wishes. For example, staff ensured people were at the centre of all decisions made at the home.

Is the service responsive?

The manager told us that the service is built around the needs of people who used the service. She told us menus and activities were planned and involved everyone living at the home.

Is the service well-led?

The manager leads a small group of staff and has built a strong ethos of enabling people to make their own decisions and lead an independent life.

The service has a quality assurance system, records seen by us showed that identified shortfalls were addressed promptly. As a result the quality of the service was continuingly improving.

9 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us they liked living at the service. They told us the staff were good and looked after them. Relatives also told us they were very happy with the service provided.

People also told us that staff treated them with respect, listened to them, gave them choices, made them feel safe and supported them to do activities they liked.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place and staff received appropriate professional development. A training programme was in place to provide staff with the training and support they needed.

There was an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received. There was a complaints policy that took account of complaints and comments to improve the service.