• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: SureCare Harrow and Watford

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pentax House, South Hill Avenue, South Harrow, Harrow, Middlesex, HA2 0DU (020) 3409 2497

Provided and run by:
Best Care Harrow Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 24 November 2018

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on the 23 October 2018 and was announced. The inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Before the inspection we looked at information we held about the service. This information included any statutory notifications that the provider had sent to the CQC. Statutory notifications include information about important events which the provider is required to send us by law.

Due to changes we made to the date of the inspection, we did not ask the provider to complete a Provider Information Return [PIR]. The PIR is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

During the inspection we spoke with the provider, registered manager, office administrator and three care workers. Following the inspection, we spoke with seven people using the service and four people’s relatives. We asked three healthcare and social care professionals for feedback about the service and received a response from one social care professional at the time of completing this inspection report.

We reviewed a variety of records which related to people's individual care and the running of the service. These records included care files of six people using the service, four staff records and a range of audits, and policies that related to the management of the service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 24 November 2018

SureCare Harrow and Watford is a domiciliary care agency. It is registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. The service provides care to people with a range of care needs. These include the needs of people living with dementia, sensory impairments and people receiving a reablement service. A reablement service is a short and intensive care and support service offered to people with disabilities and those who are frail or recovering from an illness or injury.

Not everyone using SureCare Harrow and Watford receives a regulated activity; the Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. There were 24 people receiving support with personal care at the time of the inspection. SureCare Harrow and Watford does not provide nursing care.

This was the first inspection of the service since it registered with us in February 2018. A comprehensive announced inspection was carried out. We gave the provider two working days’ notice of the inspection because the service provides care to people in their own homes and we wanted to make sure that the provider was available on the day of the inspection.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service and their relatives informed us that they were happy with the care and support that they received. People told us that they received consistency of care from staff that they knew.

People using the service told us that staff treated them well and they felt safe when being supported with their care.

Arrangements were in place to keep people safe. Policies and procedures and appropriate staff training helped protect people using the service from abuse. Staff knew how to identify abuse and understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding people and reporting all concerns.

Risks to people’s safety were identified and monitored, but some risk assessments lacked detailed information to help staff fully understand and manage those risks. Following the inspection action was taken by the service to address this.

Arrangements were in place to make sure people received the support that they needed so that they received their medicines as prescribed and safely.

A range of checks were carried out before staff were employed by the service to make sure they were suitable to work with people using the service. Staff knew the importance of respecting people’s differences and human rights.

The provider had arrangements in place to make sure that there were enough staff, with the right skills to meet people's needs. Staff received training relevant to their role. They received the support that they needed to carry out their roles and responsibilities. People told us that staff were reliable and respected their dignity and privacy.

People using the service and where applicable their relatives were fully involved in making decisions about people’s care. People’s preferences were supported. People told us that staff listened to them and encouraged their independence.

People’s care plans were person-centred. They included detailed information about the care people required and wanted, so staff had the information they needed to ensure people’s needs were met. Staff understood the importance of obtaining people’s agreement before supporting them with personal care and other tasks.

People and their relatives had opportunities to feedback about the service and issues raised by them were addressed. People knew how to make a complaint and were confident that they would be listened to and the issue addressed.

There were a range of systems in place to check, monitor and develop the service. Action was taken to make improvements when deficiencies in the service were identified. People and their relatives told us they thought the service was well run and would recommend it.