• Residential substance misuse service

Parkland Place Lancashire

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Withnell Hall, Bury Lane, Withnell, Chorley, Lancashire, PR6 8BH

Provided and run by:
Adferiad Recovery Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment of Residential substance misuse services

We assessed Parkland Place on 21 October 2025.

Parkland Place provides detoxification for drug and alcohol addiction to men and women over the age of 18. The service admits both NHS and privately funded patients from across the country. There were 23 beds at the service. At the time of our inspection there were 16 patients in treatment.

The service is registered to provide the following regulated activities:

• accommodation of persons who require treatment for substance misuse

• treatment of disease, disorder or injury

The service has a registered manager and a nominated individual.

The service provided safe care. The environment was clean and fixtures and fittings were in good condition. There were enough staff to keep patients safe, and access to the full range of specialists to meet the needs of patients. Staff minimised the use of restrictive practices and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding. Staff completed thorough risk assessments of the service and individualised risk assessments with patients and updated these regularly and/ or when risk presentation changed. Managers ensured that staff received training, supervision and appraisal and had developed strategies to boost staff wellbeing and recognise staff achievements. Feedback from patients and carers about the service was very positive. Patients told us they felt safe, and that staff were caring and treated them with kindness and respect.

Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act Compliance Summary

Parkland Place was not registered to take patients detained under the Mental Health Act.

The provider had a policy on the Mental Capacity Act, staff were aware of the policy and had access to it.

Staff received and kept up to date with training in the Mental Capacity Act and had a good understanding of the five principles. Training on the Mental Capacity Act was mandatory, and the compliance rate was 60% at the time of inspection. However, staff who were out of date for this training were booked on a training course in the near future.

Staff knew where to get advice from within the provider regarding the Mental Capacity Act. Staff assessed and recorded capacity to consent clearly each time a patient needed to make an important decision. Staff completed an assessment of each patient’s capacity to consent to admission and treatment on admission.

 

Patient’s experience of the service

We spoke with 5 patients who used the service as part of our inspection. They gave overwhelmingly positive comments. Patients said they were optimistic about their treatment and felt included in their care. They said staff treated them with dignity and respect, and that they felt safe. They also said that they felt listened to by staff and had timely access to medical help. Patients commented on the ‘immaculate’ cleanliness of the building and the comfortable surroundings. They reported that the food was of a high standard, and all their needs were catered for.

Patients said they had a range of activities they could take part in and that group sessions were well run and inclusive. They said that the activities helped them to connect with each other and form good relationships with other patients. They also stated that the location of the service allowed them to ‘reconnect with nature’ and to promote good health. Patients said that they were happy with the way the service was run and that it felt like ‘family’.

During an assessment of the hospital overall

We assessed Parkland Place on 21 October 2025. Parkland Place provides detoxification for drug and alcohol addiction to men and women over the age of 18. The service admits both NHS and privately funded patients from across the country. There were 23 beds at the service. At the time of our inspection there were 16 patients in treatment. The service is registered to provide the following regulated activities: • accommodation of persons who require treatment for substance misuse • treatment of disease, disorder or injury The service has a registered manager and a nominated individual. The service provided safe care. The environment was clean and fixtures and fittings were in good condition. There were enough staff to keep patients safe, and access to the full range of specialists to meet the needs of patients. Staff minimised the use of restrictive practices and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding. Staff completed thorough risk assessments of the service and individualised risk assessments with patients and updated these regularly and/ or when risk presentation changed. Managers ensured that staff received training, supervision and appraisal and had developed strategies to boost staff wellbeing and recognise staff achievements. Feedback from patients and carers about the service was very positive. Patients told us they felt safe, and that staff were caring and treated them with kindness and respect.

6 September 2019

During a routine inspection

We rated CAIS at Salus as good overall because:

  • The findings of this inspection mean the service is being removed from special measures.
  • The service had implemented an action plan following our last inspection that addressed all of our previous concerns. There was clear evidence that the service had improved.
  • The service provided safe detoxification from illicit substances and alcohol. The environment was safe, clean and supported recovery. The service had enough staff. Staff assessed and managed risks associated with detoxification well and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding.
  • Staff developed holistic, recovery-oriented care plans informed by a comprehensive assessment. They provided a range of treatments suitable to the needs of the clients and in line with national guidance about best practice. Clients had access to different detoxification programmes amd supporting interventions.
  • The teams included or had access to the full range of specialists required to meet the needs of clients and deliver detoxification programmes. Managers ensured that these staff received relevant training, supervision and appraisal. Staff worked well together as a multidisciplinary team and relevant services outside the organisation.
  • Staff treated clients with compassion and kindness and understood the individual needs of clients. They actively involved clients in decisions and care planning around their detoxification.
  • The service was easy to access. Staff planned and managed discharge well and had alternative pathways for people whose needs it could not meet.
  • The service was well led, and the governance processes ensured that its procedures ran smoothly.

However:

  • The rationale for the length of a clients’ detoxification programme was not always recorded in care records.
  • Although staff could provide a rationale for storing emergency medications securely there was no documented risk assessment to support this.