• Dentist
  • Dentist

Waldron Dental Clinic

2 Amersham Vale, London, SE14 6LD

Provided and run by:
Sundeep Patel

All Inspections

15 December 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection on 15 December 2020 which included a review of evidence submitted to us by the provider before the site visit. This inspection was carried out to follow up on the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

Prior to our site visit we asked the provider to send us evidence of the improvements they had implemented. This allowed us to carry out a shorter site visit when we confirmed the required improvements to the service had been made.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was accompanied by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Waldron Dental Clinic on 22 July 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing Safe or Well led care and was in breach of various regulations under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These included Regulation 12 -Safe care and treatment, Regulation 17 - Good governance, Regulation 18 Staffing. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Waldron Dental Clinic on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 22 July 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 22 July 2019.

Background

Waldron Dental Clinic is in the London Borough of Lewisham and provides private dental treatment to patients of all ages.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs.

The dental team includes three dentists, one dental nurse, one dental hygienist, one practice manager and one receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice is open: From 11.00am to 8.00pm Monday to Friday.

Our key findings were:

Improvements had been made to the decontamination process, but further improvements were still required.

Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.

Since the last inspection, the practice had stopped undertaking sedation

The practice had stopped using a wire brush to clean instruments as part of the decontamination and cleaning process.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

Improve the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’ In particular in regards to the decontamination flow and zoning of dirty and clean areas.

22 July 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 22 July 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Waldron Dental Clinic is in the London Borough of Lewisham and provides private dental treatment to patients of all ages.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs.

The dental team includes three dentists, one dental nurse, one dental hygienist, one practice manager and one receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we received feedback from two patients.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, one dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: From 11.00am to 8.00pm Monday to Friday.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff were providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had suitable information governance arrangements.
  • The provider did not have infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were however not available.
  • The practice did not have systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The clinical staff did not provide patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • The practice did not have effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice's responsibilities to take into account the needs of patients with disabilities and to comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.