• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Silomarg Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Edale 3, Genesis Centre, 32-46 King Street, Alfreton, DE55 7DQ 07445 502088

Provided and run by:
Silomarg Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 22 July to 13 August 2026.

Silomarg Ltd is a care at home agency which provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of this inspection, 8 people were receiving support. CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we consider any wider social care provided.

Silomarg Ltd is provides care for adults of all ages who may have dementia, mental health support needs, physical disability, sensory impairments, learning disability or autism. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities which most people take for granted.

This inspection was prompted as the service had not been inspected since 2019 and was rated requires improvement. The provider was also previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, good governance, staffing, and fit and proper persons employed. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. This assessment started remotely unannounced, we requested information from the provider within a specified timeframe and continued with on-site assessment activity at the provider's office on 4 August 2026.

Effective systems were in place to report and investigate incidents, accidents, safeguarding and complaints. Actions were taken and lessons learnt were shared with staff to help prevent further occurrences. Risks were appropriately assessed and managed in a way that promoted safety while maintaining independence. Staff had received relevant training and demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs. People’s prescribed medicines had been managed and administered safely as prescribed.

People had individual person-centred care plans and there was evidence of these being regularly reviewed. Referrals to health care professionals had been made when staff reported changes in people’s needs. Whilst care records generally contained appropriate information to support the delivery of care, we identified opportunities to further develop one person's Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) plan to provide more detailed and person-centred guidance for staff.

Staff supported people with kindness and dignity. Staff encouraged people to maintain their independence and engage in activities that interested them. People’s personal routines and preferences were respected. Staff we spoke with felt supported in their role and able to seek help and guidance when required.

We found systems and processes were in place to support the delivery of safe, person-centred care. People received care and support from a consistent team of staff who knew them well and provided personalised care. They valued and acted on feedback from people who use the service, staff, and other stakeholders. People were involved in decisions about their care.

Staff and the registered manager worked effectively with other health and social care professionals to support continuity of care. Governance arrangements, including audits and quality monitoring processes, provided effective oversight of the service and supported continuous improvement. The registered manager was knowledgeable about the service and demonstrated they had a good understanding of their legal requirements and needs of the people who were supported by the service.

13 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Silomarg Ltd is a is a domiciliary care provider providing personal care to two people at the time of the inspection. It provides personal care for people living in their own homes, so they can live as independently as possible.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider had not established systems to ensure the service was providing quality care. These were reflected in safety aspects not being completed to support risk management.

The required recruitment checks had not been completed to ensure staff were safe to work with people. Staff had not received training from the providers training programme. Any training received from other providers in relation to their role had not been reviewed to reflect staff competency.

Risk assessments were not in place to consider the safety of the environment or the support they may require for their long-term conditions. Reviews had not been completed to consider any changes to the care requirements or care plans being updated when people’s care needs changed. Measures had not been taken in respect of infection control to reduce the risk to people when they received care.

People told us they enjoyed the company of the staff. They had established a relationship as they had consistent staff to support them. These staff demonstrated an understanding of respecting their dignity. People remained in control of their health care needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Care plans had not been reviewed or any updates completed to reflect the persons changing needs. There was a complaints procedure, however to date this had not been used. No one was requiring end of life care; however, this could be arranged if needed.

Partnerships had been developed with local authorities to review how the service could support packages of care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection – This service was registered with us on 16 February 2018 and this is the first inspection.

Enforcement

We have identified four breaches in relation to safe recruitment, safety in relation to risk assessing, training of staff and quality and improvement at this inspection.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan for the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.