• Community
  • Community substance misuse service

CGL New Directions Mansfield

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Sherwood Court Unit 2-3, Sherwood Street, Mansfield, NG18 1ER (0115) 896 0798

Provided and run by:
Change, Grow, Live

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 9 August 2019

Change, Grow, Live (CGL) is a voluntary sector organisation specialising in substance misuse and criminal justice intervention projects in England and Wales. CGL New Directions Mansfield has been a CQC registered location since March 2018 and provides the regulated activity of:

  • treatment of disease, disorder or injury

CGL are commissioned by Nottinghamshire County Council to provide a full drug and alcohol service. This includes one to one support; group based psychosocial interventions, substitute prescribing, community detoxification and needle exchange programmes. Where needed, the service supports clients to access inpatient detoxification treatment and residential rehabilitation. CGL also had a small team dedicated to meeting the needs of young people aged under 18 years of age.

CGL staff provide interventions to residents of Nottinghamshire county from three team locations in Mansfield, Hucknall and Worksop. Staff also offer interventions from community locations, particularly in the south of the county where communities are more rural. In addition to staff based at team locations, CGL employs a range of staff located with external organisations including probation, acute hospitals and homeless teams.

This was the first inspection of CGL New Directions Mansfield since it became a CQC registered location.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 9 August 2019

We rated CGL New Directions Mansfield as good because:

  • Services provided safe care and treatment. There were enough staff, who knew clients and received training to keep them safe from avoidable harm. Staff assessed and managed risk well and followed good practice with respect to safeguarding.

  • Services provided a range of treatments suitable to the needs of the clients. This included harm reduction, substitute prescribing, blood borne testing and detoxification. Staff engaged in clinical audit to evaluate the quality of care they provided.

  • Teams included or had access to the full range of specialists required to meet the needs of the clients. Managers ensured that these staff received training and supervision. Staff worked well together as a multi-disciplinary team and with relevant services outside the organisation.

  • Staff treated clients with compassion and kindness and understood the individual needs of clients. Staff actively involved clients in care decisions and designing the service.
  • Services were easy to access. Staff assessed and treated people who required urgent care promptly and those who did not require urgent care did not wait too long to start treatment. The service did not exclude people who would have benefitted from care.

  • Services were well led, and the governance processes ensured that procedures relating to the work of the service ran smoothly.

However;

  • When starting treatment, staff requested summaries from GP’s about a client’s health and prescribed medicines. For services users accessing treatment over time, we did not see processes in place to ensure staff routinely requested updates of this information.
  • Recovery plans staff created with clients had a greater focus on the management of risk. Plans were often descriptive of staff interventions rather than focussing on the clients’ strengths and personal goals for recovery. Once completed, staff did not routinely share plans with clients.
  • The provider was making organisational changes to the way staff work performance was appraised. As a result of this, local appraisal compliance rates were low.