• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

International SOS (Medical Services) UK Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Wallace House,, Falcon Court, Preston Farm Industrial Estate,, Stockton On Tees, Cleveland, TS18 3TX (01642) 566344

Provided and run by:
Abermed Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about International SOS (Medical Services) UK Limited on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about International SOS (Medical Services) UK Limited, you can give feedback on this service.

22 May 2019

During a routine inspection

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

Iqarus Teesside offers provides remote medical support services to the energy industry and occupational health service across the UK. It is owned by Abermed Limited part of an international organisation. The head office is based in Aberdeen. The service provides a range of occupational health services such as health surveillance, psychotherapy support, statutory medicals for the oil and gas industries, seafarers, diving, travel health, drug and alcohol testing and onsite medical services.

This service is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the provision of advice or treatment by, or under the supervision of, a medical practitioner, including the prescribing of medicines.

The clinic manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We provided CQC comment cards and asked clients to complete these. We saw that nine people who were clients of the service provided feedback about the service. All nine of these comment cards were positive and described how all staff were polite, professional, friendly, helpful and efficient.

Our key findings were:

We rated the service as good for providing safe and effective services because:

  • The service provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording incidents.
  • Staff maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.
  • Staff were up to date with current guidelines and were led by a proactive management team.
  • Staff were professional, caring, competent and put patients at their ease.
  • The provider was aware of, and complied with, the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review and improve infection control monitoring.
  • Review and improve the recruitment process.
  • Review and improve the immunisation of staff

We saw the following outstanding practice:

  • Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual patients and the industries they worked in. They were delivered in a flexible way that ensured choice and continuity of care.
  • There were processes in place for clinicians in Aberdeen to review referrals and the management of complex patients undertaken in Teesside providing opportunity to effectively improve management. In return the clinicians in Teesside provided the same for the Aberdeen clinicians.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGPChief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

19 March 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 19 March 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

20 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We looked at the records of seven people who used the service. We saw that before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes.

We saw that there was a full audit trail of information which included details of the referring organisation, the service provided and the outcomes of medical assessments.

We saw that records contained evidence to confirm that people's optician and GPs had been involved with people's care when needed. This meant people's health, safety and welfare were protected when their health needs changed.

People were treated and supported by, suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff.

We found that the provider had an effective complaints procedure in place.