• Community
  • Community substance misuse service

Stockton Recovery Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

32 William Street, Stockton On Tees, Cleveland, TS18 1DN (01642) 673888

Provided and run by:
Change, Grow, Live

All Inspections

During an assessment of Substance misuse services

We inspected Stockton Recovery Service on 26 and 27 May 2026. The service delivers specialist community support for adults with drug and alcohol addiction problems. The service runs a range of groups, sessions and meetings to support clients. Some of these involve therapy that focuses on thoughts and behaviour, such as self management and recovery training. Others focussed on peer support from people with similar experiences.

People who are alcohol dependent can access detoxification either at home or in an inpatient setting depending on need and as part of a wider recovery plan. Healthcare professionals oversee the process to ensure safety and provide ongoing guidance. People may be prescribed medication to help manage withdrawal symptoms and cravings as they reduce their alcohol intake.

The service also offers a range of treatment options for people with drug problems. Support may include self-directed change for those not at risk of withdrawal, peer support groups and recovery meetings, medication-assisted treatment (such as methadone or buprenorphine) for people dependent on opioids, medically supervised detoxification, and facilitated access to residential rehabilitation programmes. Treatment plans are developed collaboratively, with clinical oversight to ensure safe prescribing, stabilisation and, where appropriate, planned reduction or detoxification.

During the previous inspection, we identified that risk management plans were not fully completed to address all risks identified and key information was missing to confirm how each risk was being mitigated and managed. This was a breach of Regulation 12 Safe care and treatment. However, this had now been addressed as risk management plans were effective in mitigating any risks identified. Other issues identified at the previous inspection such as consistently recording discharge plans had also been addressed. However, the provider continued to have challenges with evidencing that all staff received an annual appraisal.

Mental Capacity Act / Consent to Treatment Overview

All staff had completed Mental Capacity Act training and staff we spoke with demonstrated a good understanding of its principles, particularly the five statutory principles. Staff were able to identify when a client’s capacity to consent to treatment may be in question and took appropriate steps to support clients in making their own decisions.

Care records we reviewed evidenced that capacity assessments were completed and documented appropriately on a decision-specific basis for significant decisions. Where clients lacked capacity, staff involved mental health services and made best-interest decisions that considered the individual’s wishes, feelings, culture and personal history.

Staff also ensured that signed consent-to-treatment forms and confidentiality agreements were in place that clearly documented who personal information could be shared with. These records were accessible to all staff involved in the client’s care and treatment.

During an assessment of the hospital overall

Stockton Recovery Service delivers specialist community support for adults with drug and alcohol addiction problems.

We assessed Stockton Recovery Service from 26 to 27 May 2026.

Stockton Recovery Service was registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 January 2018. The regulated activity it is registered to carry out is treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The service had a registered manager at the time of the inspection who is also the service manager.

There had previously been service hubs in both Stockton and Middlesbrough. However, since our last inspection in January 2019, the Middlesbrough service has been taken over by another service provider. We inspected the Stockton hub (the location’s only hub) which is based on William Street but also has a rear entrance on Skinner Street.

20 to 22 November 2018

During a routine inspection

We rated Stockton Recovery Service as good because:

  • The service was well led by a strong, cohesive, enthusiastic management team with a good mix of skills, experience and knowledge who were working hard to further improve services and engagement with clients and their recovery. They had robust systems to ensure incidents were investigated and lessons learned were discussed amongst staff and changes implemented. Communication within the service and to and from the senior management at provider level was good. It was supported locally by a well-planned set of meetings to ensure information was shared quickly ensuring staff were well informed of key risks and developments.
  • Staff described a supportive team culture and were happy to raise concerns openly. Morale was good and staff were proud of their work and the difference it made to people’s lives. Staff were kind, caring and recovery focused. They engaged well with clients and where appropriate their families and carers. Staff understood and addressed specific needs regarding equality, diversity and human rights.
  • Clients consistently praised the staff and service. They all knew the name of their recovery worker, who they were in regular contact with. They said they felt safe, were made aware of risks and how to minimise these and felt fully involved in their treatment. If they had issues they were happy to raise these directly and were confident they would be resolved. The service provided and had access to a range of interventions to support clients, carers and families.
  • Locally engagement was good, with commissioner’s, other services such as primary care, community mental health teams, local authority safeguarding teams, police, probation and prison services as well as third sector organisations.

However:

  • There were areas of improvement required to manage safety in the service. Not all clients had a risk management plan which addressed every client risk identified. Therefore, it was not clear how staff managed all identified risks effectively. Not all staff had received the required mandatory training to ensure they could respond to physical health emergencies, although training was scheduled to be completed by February 2019.
  • Staff had not been fully appraised for the previous 12 months at the time of our inspection as a new, improved system was being introduced. The new system was planned to be piloted in January 2019 and fully introduced in March 2019.
  • Staff did not consistently record discharge plans in client records although there was good evidence during our inspection of focus on client progress and discharge.