• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Helping Hands Peterborough

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

90 Bridge Street, First Floor Premises, Peterborough, PE1 1DY (01789) 767534

Provided and run by:
Midshires Care Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Helping Hands Peterborough is a domiciliary care agency providing nursing and personal care and support to people living in their own homes, including live-in care.

Who the service is for

Helping Hands Peterborough provides support to younger adults, older adults, people living with dementia and people with physical disabilities. At the time of the inspection, 58 people were being supported with the regulated activity of personal care.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment between 14 July 2026 and 04 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good at our last assessment dated 03 July 2019. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the service against the Care Quality Commission (CQC)’s ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

Staff understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding and the processes they would follow to keep people safe. Staff told us they were confident any concerns raised would be managed appropriately. Where incidents and accidents occurred, these were investigated, and opportunities for learning and improvement were identified. People told us their needs had been assessed before care commenced. Risk assessments had been completed to identify and manage risks associated with people's health conditions and support needs.

People received care that was planned around their individual needs,preferences and choices. Care plans were person-centred and provided information about how people wished to be supported. Staff spoke about people with warmth and compassion, recognised their individuality, and promoted their dignity and independence. People were supported to maintain choice and control over their daily lives and to achieve outcomes that were important to them.

Staff were recruited safely and completed training relevant to their roles. They told us they received regular supervision,support and opportunities for development. However, some staff told us they would welcome more practical, hands-on training to further develop their skills and confidence. This was reflected in feedback from relatives, who reported some variability in staff knowledge and experience. The registered manager confirmed that plans were already underway to strengthen and expand the face-to-face training offer for staff.

Medicines were managed safely and administered by trained staff, with appropriate records maintained. The management team carried out audits of medicine records and competency checks to help ensure safe practice. Where people lacked capacity to make specific decisions, the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were followed, and best-interest decisions were made with the involvement of those who knew the person well. The provider had effective quality assurance and governance arrangements in place, helping to ensure consistent oversight and the delivery of good-quality care.

The service had experienced a period of instability due to changes within the management team. Leaders acknowledged the impact this had had on staff morale and engagement with people and their relatives. Although the registered manager was still relatively new in post, they had begun implementing changes to address these issues, and early feedback indicated that improvements were already being seen.

4 March 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Helping Hands Peterborough is a domiciliary care service that was giving personal care to 28 people at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service:

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

People told us they liked the care and support they received from staff. Staff encouraged people to complete tasks independently, or with minimal support where possible. This was done in a caring and compassionate way.

Staff were knowledgeable about safeguarding and how to report their concerns internally and externally to local safeguarding authorities. Risks to people’s health and well-being were identified and monitored. Guidance was in place for staff on how to support people with these risks. This included how to evacuate a person’s house or flat in the case of an emergency.

Staff promoted and respected people`s dignity and privacy. Staff had guidance on how to support people effectively in care plans that were individual to each person. Staff supported people with their prescribed creams in a safe manner. People told us they made decisions about what medicines they took. However, there was no guidance for staff to know signs of any potential medicine side effects.

The registered manager kept people`s personal information confidentially stored within the office. People, their relatives and advocates were involved in discussions about their care.

There were enough staff to meet people`s needs. People told us they had no concerns about staff timekeeping when attending their care visits. As much as possible the same group of staff supported people to provide consistency. This was people’s preference as they told us staff got to know them, how they liked to be cared for and their likes and dislikes. People were kept safe from risks of infection due to methods used by the staff supporting them, in line with their training.

Checks were in place before a new member of staff was deemed suitable to work with the people they supported. Staff induction into their role was based on a nationally recognised training programme called the Care Certificate. Staff had supervisions and spot checks to discuss their progress and training in subjects considered mandatory by the provider to develop their skills and knowledge. Staff learnt lessons from incidents and near misses that happened both within the organisation and within the local service.

People, their relatives, and advocates gave feedback on the quality of the service provided. People`s concerns were listened to, investigated and resolved where possible. The provider`s governance systems and processes had improved and identified areas of the service where improvements were needed. The registered manager completed internal audits to ensure the service provided to people was effective and safe.

More information is in the detailed findings below.

Rating at last inspection:

This is the first inspection of the service since they registered with the CQC on December 2017.

Why we inspected:

The service was inspected as it had not had an inspection since registering with the CQC.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.