• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Bluebird Care (Sheffield)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 11, Riverside Court, Don Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S9 2TJ (0114) 265 6670

Provided and run by:
BC Sheffield Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 1 June 2026

About the service

Bluebird Care (Sheffield) is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. The service provides domiciliary care, specialist care, companionship and palliative care. It also offers a night roaming service, which delivers short, scheduled care visits to support individuals with continence care and repositioning needs.

Who the service is for

Bluebird Care (Sheffield) provides support to younger and older adults, including people living with dementia, physical disabilities, and sensory impairments. It also supports a number of people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of the inspection, 90 people were being supported with the regulated activity of personal care.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 11 June 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the service against the ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the service was working in line with the guidance.

The service demonstrated a positive learning culture, where feedback, training and reflective practice was used to continuously improve the quality of care being delivered. People and staff told us they felt they could raise concerns, which the registered manager investigated effectively. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately. People told us they felt safe when receiving care from the service. We found safeguarding processes and systems were robust and staff told us they felt confident raising issues about safety and felt these would be listened to and the appropriate action would be taken. A staff member told us, “If I suspected abuse, I would ensure the person’s immediate safety and report my concerns promptly through the appropriate safeguarding procedures.”

We checked and found that staff and management worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

Staff worked in successful partnership with other health care professionals to ensure people received effective support. Risks to people were assessed, monitored and reviewed on a regular basis to ensure safe outcomes for the people using the service. Professionals were complimentary of the services ability to act on concerns promptly, follow guidance and make appropriate referrals in a timely manner.

We found that staff had the appropriate skills and knowledge to deliver high-quality care. Where individuals required specialist support, this was effectively provided by the service. Staff were recruited safely, with all necessary pre-employment checks completed. In addition, regular competency assessments and supervision were in place to ensure staff received the support they needed to carry out their roles confidently and safely. Staff told us they felt supported by the management team and there was a positive culture within the service.

Care plans were person centred and provided staff with detailed information on how to support people based on their assessed needs, choices and preferences.The service had effective systems in place to ensure people’s voices were heard and documented during the assessment and review process, this ensured people’s feedback was gathered and any concerns acted upon in a timely manner. A staff member told us, “Care plans and risk assessments provide clear information that helps me deliver safe and effective care. I encourage people and their families to share their preferences, wishes, and concerns so that care remains person-centred.”

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and delivered support in line with people’s preferences. We saw evidence of people’s independence and choice being respected and promoted. The service shared with us numerous examples’ of where their support had achieved positive outcomes for people. A staff member told us, “People are encouraged and supported to access community activities, appointments, and social opportunities that promote independence and wellbeing.”

Leaders had clear roles, accountability, and effective governance systems in place to deliver high-quality, sustainable care. They maintained strong oversight of performance and risks, using audits and reviews to drive continuous improvement. The leadership team was skilled, approachable, and acted with integrity. We received positive feedback from people, relatives, and staff regarding the leadership, highlighting their openness and responsiveness to concerns. Staff told us, “I believe the service is well-led. Communication is effective, and staff are supported to provide high-quality care.”

 

 

 

 

People's experience of the service

Updated 1 June 2026

People and their relatives spoke positively about their experience of the service and the care they received.

People told us staff arrived on time, stayed for the expected duration, and were flexible in meeting their needs. A person commented, “Punctuality is not a problem, and they cover all my calls. If they are going to be late, they will let me know.”

People and relatives’ spoke highly of staff competency within the service, with a relative telling us, “I’m happy with the level of training and I train the carers as well; [relative] has a peg feed and some machinery. So, I work well with the staff. The carers are very smart in their uniforms, use PPE and wash their hands.” Another relative told us, “The carers are brilliant they are properly trained, they read [relatives’] care plan and arrive on time, give 5/10minutes.” However, a person commented, “The composition of the staff group has changed, and I have no problem with that. However, the staff do have some problems understanding me. I had to go through with a carer the difference between, shoulders, ankles and wrists.”

People described receiving care that met their needs and supported them to maintain their independence and wellbeing. Feedback demonstrated that people were involved in decisions about their care and were supported in a way that reflected their preferences and routines. Care was delivered in a consistent manner, which contributed to people feeling safe and reassured in the staff supporting them. A relative told us, “Most of the carers are really nice, they are like friends, they are fantastic.” Another relative commented, “The carers are great and chat to [relative], they are like family.”

People told us staff were flexible in providing support and could adapt to changes which met people needs. A person told us, “They are very flexible for example they provided a visit at a church hall as I was there for a birthday party.”

People were involved in the assessments and reviews of their care needs. People felt they were listened to and their preferences had been taken into account.A person told us, “The carers are thorough and wash me carefully.” A relative commented, “Yes they are responsive, [relative] had gone downhill, and we asked if we could have extra visits at the weekend which they agreed to but unfortunately [relative] had to go into hospital.”

People felt listened to and knew how to share feedback or raise concerns. Leaders used regular surveys and day‑to‑day conversations to gather people’s views and demonstrated that feedback was acted upon to improve the service. A person told us, “They are a good agency, somebody always answers the phone and if they can’t answer your query they will get back to you, and they do get back to you. They are excellent and I can’t stress that enough.”

Professionals were complimentary of the service, telling us, “The service demonstrates a genuine commitment to partnership working and places the individual’s wellbeing, safety, and outcomes at the centre of all decision-making. Information is clear, comprehensive, and regularly updated.” Professionals told us Bluebird Care (Sheffield) is responsive, communicates effectively and staff have good knowledge about the people who they support.