• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Elite Homecare

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

Unit 1, Pepper Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, Cheshire, SK7 5DP 07591 044631

Provided and run by:
Mr Michael James Crossley

Important:

We served a warning notice on Michael J Crossley on 27 April 2026 for failing to meet the regulations related to good governance at Elite Homecare.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 1 April 2026 to 15 April 2026.

The service is a home care agency, providing personal care and support to people living in and around Stockport. At the time of this inspection, 10 people were receiving personal care from the service. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. We carried out this comprehensive assessment in response to concerns raised and the length of time since the last inspection.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but we saw no evidence the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

We found concerns relating to unsafe medicines management and administration. We were not assured people had received their medicines as prescribed, and staff had not received robust training and competency checks. We raised a safeguarding alert with the local authority in relation to the risks identified relating to medicines.

We were not assured people’s individual risks were being safely managed. This included safe moving and handling of people, health and safety risks to people and ensuring care records were up to date. We raised a safeguarding alert with the local authority in relation to the risks identified to people’s individual risk management.

We identified concerns with the provision of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced staff to ensure they could meet people’s care and treatment needs. We were not assured staff had received sufficient and appropriate training and competency checks to ensure the delivery of safe care and treatment, and that staff had received effective support, supervision and appraisal.

We found concerns with safe recruitment practices to ensure only suitable, fit and proper persons were employed to provide the regulated activity of personal care. Robust and appropriate recruitment checks had not always been carried out. We shared our concerns with the local authority.

There was a lack of oversight of operations of the service and concerns we found had not been identified and/or actioned to ensure safe and effective care. Information given to us during the inspection period was not always accurate. Information about the service, staff and people we requested was not always available and was not always supplied in a timely way or not supplied at all. We were not assured statutory notifications were being submitted as per requirements. There was a lack of oversight, analysis and investigation of any incidents and potential safeguarding concerns and we were not assured relevant action was being taken to mitigate future risks to people.

However, we found staff were kind and caring when providing care and support and knew people’s needs well. We received no concerns in relation to staff from people and they shared positive feedback around how they promoted people’s independence and choice.

We identified breaches in relation to individual risk management, medicines management, staffing, safe recruitment practices and governance of the service.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward. We have also asked the provider for an action plan in response to some of the concerns found at this assessment.

This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

 

3 April 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Elite Homecare is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection, 29 people were using the service. Not everyone using the service receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service:

The service had a new management team in place. The new manager had a number of plans to improve the quality of service delivery. This included changes to care records, staff induction and training and governance.

There were systems in place to support the safe recruitment of staff which included references and checks with the disclosure and barring service (DBS).

Staff received the training and support they needed to undertake their role. People said staff knew how to support them appropriately and were well trained.

People and relatives told us staff were respectful and ensured people had their dignity and privacy maintained. People were encouraged to be independent and do as much as they could for themselves.

People and staff told us that there was continuity of care. This meant that people were being supported by staff who knew them well. The manager told us that continuity of care was a priority for the service.

Care records contained the essential information to guide staff on how to support people. The manager was in the process of changing care records and the new paperwork demonstrated care plans would be more person-centred and detailed.

Care records contained information about people’s interests and hobbies. Cultural and religious preferences were considered and detailed within records.

The provider was committed to using information from accidents, incidents, safeguarding, concerns and complaints to drive improvement within the service. This work was ongoing.

Rating at last inspection:

This was the first inspection of the service at this registered location where care is co-ordinated for people living in Stockport. The service was previously registered at a different address where it co-ordinated care for people living in Oldham and Stockport. At that inspection the service was rated as requires improvement (19 September 2017).

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection in line with CQC’s guidelines to inspect all newly registered services within 12 months of registration.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the service through information we receive and inspect in line with our re-inspection schedule for services rated good overall.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk