Archived: Sycamore Park Care Home

Sycamore Park Care Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Sycamore Park accommodates a maximum of 46 people; there are three separate suites providing accommodation and communal areas located on the ground, first and second floor. The home provides care and support to people who are assessed as having personal care and support needs. The first floor provides accommodation specifically for people living with dementia. There were 44 people living at the home at the time of the inspection.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe. Staff were aware of the importance of reporting any concerns they may have about people’s safety. Risks to people were assessed and reviewed. The premises and equipment were clean and well maintained. Staff had completed fire drills although they had not participated in a simulated evacuation.

There were sufficient staff on duty to meet people’s needs. There was a process in place to reduce the risk of employing unsuitable staff. Medicines were stored safely and administered in a caring manner.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible.

New staff received an induction. There was a programme of training, supervision and appraisal in place to ensure staff had the knowledge and skills to meet people’s needs. Staff communicated effectively and people had access to other health care professionals when needed.

Meals were home cooked, people could choose what they wanted to eat and were served adequate portions to meet their individual needs. Staff verbally prompted people to eat their meals and supported people to eat where this was needed.

Each suite was nicely furnished and there was access from the ground floor to a secure garden. The suite for people who were living with dementia had limited signage to enable people to orientate themselves to the location of key areas such as the dining room or a toilet.

People told us staff were caring and kind. People were relaxed in staff’s company and we saw only nice, professional interactions between staff and the people they supported. People were supported by staff who knew them well. Staff took steps to ensure people dignity was maintained and respected people’s right to privacy.

There was a range of activities provided for people who lived at the home.

Care records were generated on an electronic system although there were also some paper records. Care plans were not always person centred and where people’s needs had changed, this information was not always easily seen. Improvements were needed to the quality of moving and handling information. Action was taken at the time of the inspection by the registered manager to address this.

Advance care planning around people’s end of life care wishes were not always in place.

We have made a recommendation about improvements to record keeping.

People and staff spoke positively about the registered manager. Staff felt listened to and supported by the management team.

There was a programme in place to ensure regular audits were completed on various aspects of the service. Where concerns were identified, we saw these had been addressed. However, we have made a recommendation about improving the auditing system.

There was a system in place to gather feedback from people and staff. Regular meetings were held and a quality survey had recently been distributed to people.