• Care Home
  • Care home

The Laurels Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

High Street, Norton, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN6 9EU (01302) 709691

Provided and run by:
Trust Care Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

The Laurels Care Home is a residential care home which consists of 2 separate units and can accommodate up to 51 people. At the time of our assessment there were 49 people living at the service.

Who the service is for

The service provides support for older people, people living with dementia and people with physical disabilities.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 15 June 2026. This service was previously rated good and we carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

There was a learning culture in the service where accidents and incidents were recorded, reviewed and analysed. Lessons learned were identified and shared with members of staff to support continuous improvement.

There were clear processes in place to share concerns about safety. People told us they felt safe and care and support was delivered in line with their needs. A member of staff told us, “If I suspected abuse, I would look out for the signs of abuse, record the facts and report the suspected abuse to my manager in detail. I keep people safe by implementing the designated care plans and risk assessments and also by implementing the training I received from the organisation aimed at caring for people. I would report to my manager if I witnessed any abuse. The safety of the people I look after is important and their wellbeing comes first.” People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS. We found members of staff and the management team worked within the principles of the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions; they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

People’s care plans were person-centred and regularly reviewed and updated. Care plans and risk assessments gave accurate information which supported the delivery of safe care. We observed people’s care being delivered in line with their care plans.

The care environment was clean and well-maintained. Appropriate checks and reviews of service and equipment were carried out in line with national standards and expectations.

Members of staff were recruited safely and were well-trained and supported by the provider and the management team. Teams of staff were deployed effectively throughout the care home and were able to respond to people’s needs quickly.

There were good processes in place to manage the administration of medicines safely. Regular reviews and checks provided assurances people received their medicines as prescribed.

People were provided with a choice of meal options which were nutritious and well-prepared. Members of staff were knowledgeable about people who required fortified or specialised diets. Where people needed specialist support for eating and drinking, referrals were made appropriately.

Members of staff were kind and caring. They knew the people they supported, and care was delivered with dignity and respect. People were encouraged to make choices and decisions about their care to support their independence. A relative told us, “[Family member] gets themself dressed and [staff] only assist if needed. [Family member] likes to play bingo and go to the coffee mornings and keep fit. They do not like to sit in the lounge and gossip. [Family member] can make lots of choices, like not going to the lounge and deciding to potter around in their room. [Family member] is up at 6am and [staff] give them a cup of tea.”

Care and support were person-centred and there were regular opportunities for people to be involved in discussions and meetings where their feedback about care and activities was used to make improvements to the delivery of care and support.

The registered manager and the management team were dedicated to supporting the delivery of high-quality care and support to people. There was a clear system of oversight and governance in place to ensure care was delivered effectively and appropriately. The management team were skilled, approachable, and acted with integrity. We heard from people about how good and involved the registered manager was in their care and well-being. A relative said, “The registered manager is great. They are lovely and we can chat to them.” A member of staff told us, “The registered manager gives great support to staff. They are very approachable and will listen if you have any problems and to any ideas you have. I am happy and privileged to work with such a great a team of cares staff and managers.”

16 February 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The Laurels is registered to accommodate up to 51 older people, and people with physical disabilities. The home is arranged in two separate units and provides both nursing and personal care. It is located in Norton, a village north of Doncaster. At the time of our inspection there were 32 people using the service.

We found the following examples of good practice.

The home looked and smelled clean, and was well ventilated and uncluttered, while still maintaining a homely feel. Staff were seen to be wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately and being careful to maintain social distance, where possible. This helped to minimise the risk of infection. There was PPE and hand sanitising facilities at strategic points throughout the home and we saw staff sanitised their hands frequently.

There was an activities coordinator who helped to help minimise the effects of social isolation by organising activities as well as providing one to one support to people in their rooms. The activities coordinator also helped people to stay in touch with their family and friends by phone and on-line face to face chats. There were areas of the home which were designated to meet the needs of people who would not benefit from isolating in their rooms for long periods.

The registered manager and their team had good knowledge of current guidance. They ensured dissemination of information to staff, liaised with relevant agencies, and maintained good communication with people and their families. The service learned lessons and responded positively to address shortfalls and improve the service. Best practice feedback had recently been provided by a visiting infection control nurse and, as a result, changes had been implemented quickly and effectively.

7 November 2018

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 7 November 2018 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection since a change in registration in November 2017.

The Laurels is a ‘care home.’ People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The Laurels provides accommodation for up to 50 people. The home consists of two separate units. The service provides accommodation for people who require personal care, with nursing. The home is located in Norton, a village north of Doncaster. At the time of our inspection there were 49 people using the service.

At the time of our inspection the service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were safeguarded against the risk of abuse. Staff confirmed they had received training in the subject and knew what action to take if they suspected abuse.

Risks associated with people’s care were identified and managed appropriately. Risk assessments were in place to guide staff in ensuring risks were minimised.

We observed staff interacting with people and found there were enough staff available to meet people's needs. The registered provider followed robust recruitment procedures which ensured staff were recruited in a safe way.

People’s medicines were managed safely and people received their medicines as prescribed.

Staff had the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care. People were supported to maintain a healthy, balanced diet which met their needs and preferences. People had access to healthcare professionals and their advice was followed.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The service was compliant with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

During our inspection we found staff interacted positively with people who used the service. Staff were kind and caring in their manner, knew people well and provided a homely atmosphere.

We looked at care records belonging to people who used the service and found evidence that staff were responsive to people’s needs.

Social activities and stimulation was available throughout the day of the inspection. This was varied to meet people’s preferences, choices and needs. We observed people enjoyed participating.

The registered provider had a complaints procedure and people we spoke with felt able to raise concerns if they needed to. Complaints received had been followed up effectively and used to develop the service.

The registered provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service. Residents and relative’s meetings took place and people felt they had a voice.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.