• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: George Crouch Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Althorne Way, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 7DG (020) 8595 1725

Provided and run by:
London Borough of Barking & Dagenham

All Inspections

23 & 26 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The George Crouch Centre is an extra care housing scheme run by the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham consisting of 32 flats. The council provides personal care or help with medicines to a number of tenants in the scheme assessed as needing this type of support. At the time of this inspection there were eleven people who received support with personal care or with their medicines. The flats are divided between two floors which are accessible by a lift.

There was registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found the medicines record for one medicine for one person did not show a running total so the provider could not be sure the person was receiving this medicine as prescribed. Risk assessments were carried out and risk management plans were in place but in the case of one person a risk had not been identified. Staff had received training in whistleblowing and safeguarding.

Building health and safety checks were carried out. The service had a plan to respond to emergencies which staff were aware of. Safe recruitment checks were carried out. Staff received regular training, supervisions and appraisals. People gave their consent to staff before care was delivered. Staff were able to provide support to people to make and attend health care appointments. Some people received support with food preparation and staff were aware of their dietary requirements.

People and a relative told us staff were caring and staff had spent time getting to know people, their care needs and preferences. Staff were knowledgeable about maintaining people’s independence, dignity, privacy and self-respect.

Staff were aware of how to deliver a personalised care service but told us extra staff would enable them to give more time to people and offer more activities. Some people felt there should be more activities. The registered manager told us there were usually more staff on duty to enable this to happen but two staff members were currently on long term sick leave. Staff and people were aware of the complaints procedure and we saw complaints had been dealt with in accordance with the complaints policy.

The service had systems in place to obtain feedback from staff, people and involved professionals. Quality assurance systems were in place to audit the care provided. However audits did not show when actions had been completed.

24 February 2014

During a routine inspection

Twelve people were using the provider's in-house personal care service at the time of the inspection which was the maximum number of people the service could support at any one time. We spoke with four people who received this service. People were happy with their care and told us their care workers arrived on time and were caring and friendly. One person said, "they are very good. They come on time. I'm generally very happy."

We observed staff interacting with people positively and respecting people's communication needs, independence and privacy. We reviewed a number of care plans which included clear information about people's assessed needs and any risks. People felt safe with their care workers and knew who to contact if they had any concerns. One person said, "I would raise it with [the manager]. I think they would do the right thing."

We spoke with one care worker and two managers. The care worker told us they had good support from their managers and they received regular supervision. Staff were trained for their roles. The provider monitored the quality of the service by carrying out spot checks of care, auditing records, investigating complaints and incidents and obtaining feedback from people using the service and their relatives.