• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: EBS Instant Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

95 Wheatacre Road, Clifton, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG11 8LS (0115) 984 1961

Provided and run by:
EBS Instant Care Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

30 April 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection of the service on 30 April 2015. There were breaches of legal requirements at our last inspection in February 2014 and we had been assured by the provider that improvements were made. During this visit we found improvements were maintained.

EBS Instant Care provides personal care and support to people in the Nottingham area. There were five people receiving care in their own homes at the time of our visit.

There was a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe with the staff that cared for them. The provider had suitable arrangements in place to identify the possibility of abuse and to reduce the risk of people experiencing abuse. Staff were knowledgeable about how to recognise abuse and confirmed they had completed relevant safeguarding training.

People’s needs had been assessed and assessments were in place that identified potential risks for people. People’s home environment was assessed as safe and secure for staff to attend to people’s needs.

People felt supported by appropriately skilled and trained staff because the provider had a robust recruitment process in place. There were sufficient numbers of staff to cover calls in an effective and caring way.

People were supported to make informed choices and staff had awareness of the Mental Capacity (MCA) Act 2005. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is designed to protect people who do not have the mental capacity to make certain important decisions for themselves. We found that the MCA was being adhered to.

People were supported to receive sufficient to eat and drink. Care plans contained individual information relevant to the person. People were encouraged to be independent and received relevant information on how the service was run. People felt that they could express their views about the service that they received.

People knew how to raise any concerns, they knew who they should contact and raise the concern with.

People received care which met their needs. They were treated with respect and the staff cared for people in a caring way.

Complaints and concerns were logged and monitored to ensure they were dealt with in a timely manner. Outcomes were reviewed to improve the practise and to reduce the risk of reoccurrence.

The service was monitored regularly by the registered manager to make sure a quality service was provided.

6, 7 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people who used the service. We visited two people in their own homes and spoke with three members of staff.

We observed staff treating people with dignity and respect. People who used the service told us they made their own choices regarding their care.

We found the care files were not person centred. They did not reflect people's likes and dislikes for how they wanted to live.

People said they felt safe in their own homes and trusted the people who cared for them. However, we found there were no safeguarding procedures in place for staff to follow. The provider had not put suitable arrangements in place to ensure people were safeguarded against the risk of abuse happening.

Some people who used the service were responsible for taking their own medication and others required prompting but not all staff were trained to administer medication safely.

Staff were not given the appropriate support and training to enable them to care for people safely. However people using the service commented positively on the care they received from staff.

We found audits were not taking place and care plans were not always reviewed in a timely manner. People who used the service were asked for their views on the service, but the provider could not provide us with any evidence that the systems were robust enough to assess and monitor the quality of the service.

We found records were stored securely, but were not away accurate or recorded correctly.