• Care Home
  • Care home

Autism Support and Care Also known as Jubilee Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Jubilee Court, 1 Jubilee Road, Sutton In Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 2DB (01623) 212090

Provided and run by:
Sun Healthcare Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 23 March 2026

Date of Assessment: 03 June 2026. Rock Court is a supported living service providing support to adults of all ages living with a learning disability and autistic people. The service is made up of a communal building where people can get together, this is also where staff are based. There are 6 studio apartments and 4 one-bedroom flats over 3 floors around a central courtyard, all within secure grounds. At the time of our assessment one person was receiving the regulated activity of personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Right Support: The person was encouraged to lead their lives in their chosen way and supported to access meaningful activities in the home and local community. Staff involved them in decisions and planning any changes to their care.

Independence was encouraged and supported. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were kept safe. Staff understood and managed risk while supporting people to take part in activities in their local community, maintain relationships, and be their authentic selves. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications, and experience. The management team ensured staff received training and regular supervision to maintain good quality care. Staff consistently managed medicines well and people had regular health checks and medication reviews.

Right Care:

The person was treated with kindness and compassion and received dignified care that respected their privacy and human rights. Care and support was person centred. Individualised care and support plans were in place that enabled staff to provide person led, outcome focussed, and safe care. People’s preferred communication style was known and respected.

Right Culture:

The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensured the person supported by the Rock Court team led a confident and inclusive life. Staff and managers had shared values which were based on people receiving dignified support from compassionate staff to empower them to be as independent as possible.

 

People's experience of the service

Updated 23 March 2026

The person living at the service was able to, and consented to, speak with us and contribute their views. However, to ensure our assessment was no’t intrusive or impactful on the person we limited conversation in line with their preferences and used observation and reviewed documentation to fully assess whether they received good care. This approach showed the person was respected and listened to, and staff consistently interacted with them in a warm and positive manner. Our observations showed the person knew staff and leaders well and felt confident engaging with them.

The person spoke positively about their care and staff that they indicated they enjoyed working with. They knew who to speak with if they had concerns and we observed positive engagement between staff and the person supported. The person was supported by staff that understood their background and life history, which guided their practice. They understood how to communicate effectively with the person but also when to withdraw and allow them space and privacy. Staff approached difficult conversations sensitively and treated the person with empathy and understanding even during times of distress when they were most likely to disengage from staff.