The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

OHP-Church Stretton Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Easthope Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6BL (01694) 722127

Provided and run by:
Our Health Partnership

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about OHP-Church Stretton Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about OHP-Church Stretton Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

During an assessment under our new approach

We carried out an announced assessment of one quality statement, equity of access, under the key question Responsive on 6 March 2024. Responsive assessments are remote focused reviews to help us understand what practices are doing to try to meet patient demand and the current experience of people who use these services and of providers. We recognise the great and often innovative work that GP practices have been engaged in to continue to provide safe, quality care to the people they serve. We know colleagues are doing this while demand for general practice remains exceptionally high, with more appointments being provided than ever. In this challenging context, access to general practice remains a concern for people. These assessments of the quality statement Equity in Access in the responsive key question includes looking at what practices are doing to improve patient access to primary care and sharing this information to drive improvement. People can access services when they need to, without physical or digital barriers, including out of normal hours and in an emergency. People are given support to overcome barriers to ensure equal access. The practice understood the challenges to patient access and responded to patient needs. We found that leaders used people’s feedback and other evidence to actively seek to improve access for people. Services were designed to make them accessible and timely for people who were most likely to have difficulty accessing care. The provider prioritised, allocated resources and opportunities as needed to tackle inequalities and achieve equity of access.

4 February 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at OHP Church Stretton Medical Centre on 4 February 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected

  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and

  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.

  • There was a positive culture for reporting, recording and learning from signiificant events.

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.

  • Clinical audits were carried out and the results of these were used to improve outcomes for patients.

  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.

  • Data form the national patient survey showed the practice was rated higher in most indicators than local and national averages for providing caring and responsive services.

  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.

  • Staff were supported in their roles and with their professional development.

  • Regular meetings were held with staff to communicate to share information and practice performance.
  • Leaders were knowledgeable about issues and priorities relating to the quality and future of services. They understood the challenges and were addressing them.

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had developed and implemented an in-house safety netting system for monitoring patients on high risk medicines on shared care arrangements. This ensured patients were only prescribed medicines following effective review of their required blood tests.

  • As part of a recent development between the practice and local primary and secondary schools, the appointed safeguarding lead had attended school link mental health sessions. These provided an opportunity to discuss problems and difficulties faced by schools when dealing with vulnerable children. As a result of these sessions, a GP-Schools Link form was developed and implemented allowing information to be shared between the practice, families and schools.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Further develop health and safety risk assessments and update the business continuity plan and the practice policies and procedures.

  • Ensure all staff recruitment files contain the required checks including locum staff.

  • Develop a formal system for reviewing nurse clinical decisions made in minor illness/injury clinics held.

  • Provide the escalation route to complainants should they not be happy with the outcome or the management of their complaint.

  • Review the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) exception reporting for patients with diabetes.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice