• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Help Unlimited 4 Cresswell Corner

4 Creswell Corner, Anchor Hill, Knaphill, Woking, Surrey, GU21 2JD

Provided and run by:
Personnel Service Limited

All Inspections

2 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We looked at how staff gained consent from people. People told us that staff always asked them permission before any support was provided.

We found that most people's care plans had been reviewed regularly and there were up to date risk assessments on each care plan. Most of the people that we spoke with told us that they were happy with the care that was provided.

We found that there were suitable arrangements in place that dealt with medicines. The service had an up to date medicines policy and we saw that staff received medication training.

We saw that the service did not have appropriate recruitments procedures in place. Some of the staff files that we looked at did not have pre-employments checks in place before the member of staff started work.

Although we saw that staff have received up to date mandatory training; most of the staff told us that they felt the training (which was all DVD based) was not sufficient. We also found that staff did not feel supported in their roles.

The service had systems in place to monitor and assess the quality of the service that was provided. This included quality assurance questionnaires to people who used the service and audits on the daily care notes that were written by staff.

18 December 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was a follow up visit to check whether the provider had taken action that related to training and support of staff and assessing and monitoring the quality of the service.

During our inspection we found that all of the mandatory training was up to date for staff. This included training on moving and handling, infection control, safeguarding vulnerable adults and food hygiene. We spoke with six members of staff. They all told us that they had completed all of their mandatory training.

Most of the staff we spoke with told us that they did not feel supported by their managers and that they had not had the opportunity to have a one to one meeting with their managers to discuss their development within the organisation.

We saw that the service undertook monthly quality assurance questionnaires with the people who used the service to establish their views. We noted that spot checks had been carried out by the managers to assess the quality of the care that was given by staff.

9 November 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was a follow up visit to check whether the provider had completed the action plan submitted to CQC following their last inspection in February 2012. The action plan related to care and welfare of people who used the service, safeguarding vulnerable people, requirements relating the recruitment of staff, training and support of staff and assessing and monitoring the quality of the service.

We found that all care plans had been updated and there were up to date risk assessments in each of them.

We spoke to four people who used the service. They told us that the care they received was good. One person told us that they 'enjoyed seeing their carer.'

Three of the people we spoke to told us that they didn't always understand what the care worker said because the staff member did not have English as their first language.

During our inspection we found that not all of the mandatory training was up to date for staff.

We looked at two staff files and saw that the correct recruitment processes had been followed.

We spoke to staff who told us that they felt supported however three of them told us that they had not had any 1-1 meetings with their managements.

15 May 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

We spoke to two people who use the service and to six representatives of people who use the service to ask their views about the service provided.

All the people we spoke to made positive comments about the service they or their relative received. People told us they usually have the same care worker and they are advised if a new care worker will be attending. One person told us 'it doesn't matter who comes because they're all very good'.

People told us the care workers arrive on time and provide the care as required by the person using the service and as recorded in their care plan.

We were told that people using the service felt they were respected. People using the service or their representatives told us that if they had any concerns about the service they were receiving these had been dealt with by office staff in a helpful and prompt manner.

As part of this inspection we visited both of the registered locations operated by the provider. All the records and documents regarding the operation of the agency were stored and seen at the Knaphill location and all the comments from people who use the service and staff apply across the two registered locations. The reports in respect of both locations will therefore include the same content.