• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Orchid Home Care Support Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Cube, Office P, 1st Floor, Coe Street, Bolton, BL3 6BU (01204) 654743

Provided and run by:
Orchid Home Care Support Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 31 March 2026

Date of Assessment: 28 April to 29 April 2026. This inspection was undertaken due to the age of the existing rating. Orchid Home Support Limited is a domiciliary care organisation providing personal care and support in people’s own homes. The service is registered to provide personal care to older people, people living with dementia, people with mental health support needs, people with physical disabilities or sensory impairment, people with learning disabilities and autistic people. At the time of this inspection, 130 people were being supported.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture.’

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff carried out risk assessments and regularly reviewed these.

People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well, and any gaps in medicines records were rectified immediately.

People received kind and compassionate person-centred care. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity and understood and responded to their individual needs. People’s physical, mental and social needs were holistically assessed and met. Care and treatment were based on current best practice and delivered in a coordinated way with involvement from other relevant organisations. Staff focussed on maximising people’s strengths and promoting what they could do for themselves.

There was an open and transparent culture within the service with a clear focus on providing good care. People and those important to them were involved in planning their care, where possible. The provider fostered a learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly.

Staff described a positive culture where they felt supported and able to raise concerns or make suggestions. A staff member told us, “The registered manager will carry out investigations and review all the information. After this we get feedback, and the registered manager also updates all the staff group in the staff App.” A second staff member said, “I feel very confident the registered manager would listen and act and inform staff where necessary. I have no fears.”

The provider had effective quality assurance and governance arrangements, ensuring consistent oversight and good standards of care. Concerns and complaints were managed appropriately. The registered manager reviewed feedback for trends and shared learning across the team to improve service delivery.

People's experience of the service

Updated 31 March 2026

Feedback from people and relatives regarding the quality of care provided was consistently positive. People told us they felt safe when supported by staff and relatives confirmed this.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends.

Staff responded to people in a timely way; our analysis of care staff attendance records showed 97% of planned support calls were delivered on time. There was no evidence of short calls, and over 100% of planned support time was delivered on some occasions, because staff sometimes stayed longer to support people, where there was a need. People had the equipment they needed in their own homes, and staff ensured rooms were adjusted where applicable to enable the use of any equipment such as wheelchairs or hoists.

People and relatives were involved in planning care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it.

People were supported to live healthier lives and were supported appropriately with their diet and nutrition. People and relatives’ views were regularly sought and used to help improve the care provision.

People received fair and equal care and treatment, and no concerns were reported about discrimination or any unfair treatment. Staff mostly arrived on time at their scheduled support visits. Staff support provided to people maximised their choice, control and independence. Care was person-centred and promoted people’s dignity, privacy and human rights.

Relatives were complimentary of the care and support provided. They told us the service had made a difference to the quality of life of their loved ones and also spoke positively of the staff, who were described as providing good care. People felt confident to complain if they needed to.