• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Sterling Homecare (Derby)

11 Brunel Parkway, Pride Park, Derby, Derbyshire, DE24 8HR (01332) 890718

Provided and run by:
Sterling Homecare Limited

All Inspections

17, 18 September 2013

During a routine inspection

People and their relatives praised the service and told us staff were respectful and said they were able to make choices. One person said “They always ask how I want things done” and another person said staff were very polite. One person described the service as friendly, another said they were very, very pleased and another said “They go the extra mile”. One person told us staff listened to them and said “They are really trying hard”. However, we also found that there were some incidents of missed or late calls and that the service was not completing a telephone monitoring system properly.This meant that the service was unable to provide proper evidence that calls were made and were on time.

People we spoke with confirmed that they were either responsible for their own medication or were happy with the support received to manage it safely. We saw records that showed this had improved since our previous inspection visit in August 2012.

We found care workers received sufficient training and support to perform their role and the agency had an effective system for monitoring the quality of the service that included obtaining people's views.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

We followed up four areas of non compliance identified at the previous inspection in August 2012. We asked for an updated improvement plan in December 2012, which demonstrated the provider's compliance in these areas.

The provider told us that everyone's careplans had been discussed with them and updated, and each person given a copy. Rotas had been changed to include travel time, and people were made aware of any changes.

The provider told us all staff had received one to one medication training, which had identified additional training needs for some staff. Medication records were being audited and issues discussed with the relevant member of staff. Additional medication training was being provided for the management team.

The provider had reviewed how they deliver training, and would be using external sources to deliver training specific to the needs of people who use the service. The systems in place for induction training and supervision had also been reviewed. A system had been introduced for monitoring attendance at supervision and training sessions.

15 August 2012

During a routine inspection

People told us they felt able to express their views and some people had been involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. Not everyone spoken with was aware of or had seen and agreed their care plan, although they all knew a file was kept in their house.

One person told us the care workers did not always deliver care as agreed as they did not appear to know what they should be doing, and some staff had to be instructed several times before the person was satisfied with the service delivered. Another person told us the care plan which had been viewed by care workers at the office was a number of years out of date.

People told us that although they were given a weekly rota, they did not always know which care workers would be visiting, as there were gaps on the rotas. They said the service sometimes contacted them to tell them which care worker would be covering the call, but often they had to ring the office themselves.

A number of people told us they often experienced difficulties when they contacted the office. They told us although their call was always answered, there were times when the person they needed to speak with was not available and they requested a call back. People told us they rarely received a call back, which meant they had to call the office again.