You are here

Right Choice Home Care Requires improvement

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Requires improvement

Updated 3 October 2019

About the service

Right Choice Home Care is a domiciliary care service in the London Borough of Bromley providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes. The service was supporting three people at the time of this inspection.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We found concerns in relation to aspects of the management and governance of the service. The monitoring of the quality and safety of the service was not always effective. The complaints process had also not been provided to people and their relatives. Staff recruitment processes failed to fully follow legal requirements to ensure staff had an appropriate criminal record check before they started work or check on staff conduct in previous employment in health and social care

Other areas needed improvement. People and their relatives were not provided with adequate information about the service to refer to. Staff training needed some improvement to ensure staff new to health and social care received training to a recognised standard and that staff received training to meet the full range of people’s needs. Staff had training on administering medicines; however, their competency had not been assessed in line with the provider’s policy. Some risk assessment records were not sufficiently detailed to provide an accurate record of care and support, although this issue was addressed following the inspection.

We were only able to gather feedback from one person and their relative and they were very complimentary about the care and support they received. They told us they felt very safe and had the same consistent care workers who were reliable and stayed the full length of the call. Staff had safeguarding training and understood their roles in relation to safeguarding. Risks to people were identified and assessed and guidance was provided to staff to manage risks. There were systems to administer medicines as prescribed Staff understood how to reduce the risk of infection.

People’s needs were assessed before they started to use the service and their nutritional needs were identified and met. The service worked with health care professionals and relatives to ensure people’s health care needs were met. Staff sought people’s consent when offering them support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People and their relative said staff treated them with care and kindness and they were consulted about the support they received. Staff treated people with dignity and respected their privacy.

People had a personalised plan for their care that reflected their needs. People’s needs in respect of their protected characteristics were assessed and supported. The service had matched people with staff from the same cultural back ground. They understood people’s cultural and religious needs and how to support them to meet these needs as required.

There were some systems to monitor the quality and safety of the service through checks on medicines records and spot checks on staff. Staff told us there was a supportive working culture at the service and the management team were approachable and available. Meetings were held to promote effective communication. The service had links with local voluntary agencies they could sign post people to if this was appropriate.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 28 October 2017 and this is the first inspection as it had only started to provide personal care since April 2019.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on our inspection scheduling for new services.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe, effective, responsive and w

Inspection areas

Safe

Requires improvement

Updated 3 October 2019

The service was not always safe.

Details are in our safe findings below.

Effective

Requires improvement

Updated 3 October 2019

The service was not always effective.

Details are in our effective findings below.

Caring

Good

Updated 3 October 2019

The service was caring.

Details are in our caring findings below.

Responsive

Requires improvement

Updated 3 October 2019

The service was not always responsive.

Details are in our responsive findings below.

Well-led

Requires improvement

Updated 3 October 2019

The service was not always well-led.

Details are in our well-led findings below.