• Care Home
  • Care home

OSJCT Langford View

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Coach House Mews, Bicester, Oxfordshire, OX26 6EW (01869) 252343

Provided and run by:
The Orders Of St. John Care Trust

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 28 July 2021

The inspection

This was a targeted inspection to check on specific concerns we had about staffing levels, management of falls, management of medicines, management of weight loss, unclean environment, poor provision of activities, poor communication and poor management of the home.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

This inspection was undertaken by three inspectors and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

Langford View is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did before inspection

The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with four people and three relatives. We also received written feedback from two relatives. We looked at five people’s care records. We spoke with the registered manager, head of care and five staff which included, nurses, care staff, domestic staff and activities coordinator. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We received feedback from one healthcare professional.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 28 July 2021

Langford View is a nursing home run by The Orders of St John Care Trust. The home provides support and nursing care for up to 60 older adults. This includes support for people living with dementia.

At our last inspection we rated the service good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good

At our previous inspection on 22 October 2015. We identified that the service did not always maintain accurate medicines administration records (MAR). This was a breach of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. At this inspection we found that the registered manager had made significant improvements to address our concerns. MAR were completed to show when medication had been given. People's medicines were managed safely and kept under regular review.

People told us that they felt safe. Staff were aware of how to safeguard people from harm and were aware of potential risks and signs of abuse. There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

People's health care needs were taken care of and they had access to a range of healthcare professionals. Where required, appropriate referrals were made to external health professionals such as G.P’s or therapists. People told us they enjoyed the food provided by the home.

People and their relatives were very complimentary about the staff and management at the home. They told us staff were kind, caring and compassionate. Staff members, including the management team, were knowledgeable about individuals' care and support needs and preferences.

The provider had systems in place to receive feedback from people who used the service, their relatives, and staff members about the service provided. People were encouraged and supported to raise any concerns with staff or management and were confident they would be listened to and things would be addressed.

There was an open and inclusive culture in the home and people, their relatives and staff felt they could approach the management team and were comfortable to speak with the registered manager if they had a concern.