• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Hadley House Nursing Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

24-26 Jersey Avenue, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 2JQ (020) 8907 7047

Provided and run by:
Stanmore Residential Homes Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 August 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) which looks at the overall quality of the service.

We inspected Hadley House Nursing Home on 11 August 2014.

Hadley House Nursing Home provides accommodation and nursing care for up to 14 people who may have mental health needs. There were 14 people living at the home when we visited, most of whom were over 65 years of age. One of the proprietors of the service was also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider.

People we spoke with and visiting relatives told us that the staff looked after them well and they liked living at Hadley House Nursing Home. One person said, “I love it here and I’m really glad that I live here. They really look after me here.” Another person said, “I love living here, it is great. They are all so good to us here. Bless this house.”

During our inspection of the premises we noted some possible risks to people’s safety. We noted that some medicines that were no longer required had not been returned to the pharmacist for disposal in order to minimise the risk of staff administering medicines that were not currently required. We observed that cleaning substances that may be hazardous to health were not stored securely. A “sharps” box, designed for safe disposal of needles used for injections and blood tests was overfull and the lid could not close, which was a risk to people’s health and safety. Staff made sure that these items were stored safely during our visit to the home. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

The registered manager carried out regular checks of health and safety in the home. However these checks had not found the areas of risks to people’s safety that we observed concerning storage of cleaning substances that may be hazardous to health, and arrangements for safe disposal of medicines and of needles used for injections and blood tests. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

People received care from staff who had the knowledge and skills to carry out their roles and responsibilities effectively. Two visiting relatives told us that they were confident that staff had training to understand the needs of each person and how to support them. People who used the service told us that there were always staff available to help them when needed. Two visiting relatives said that staff were always available to talk to and there were always enough staff in the home.

People who used the service told us that the staff understood and looked after their health care needs very well. A relative said, “[The person] is much better since they have been here than when they were in the hospital. They are looked after very well.” A health care professional told us that staff contacted them appropriately and followed the advice they gave. They said that the staff were very attentive and provided good healthcare.

People told us they were treated with kindness and compassion and their dignity was respected. One person said, “It’s nice here. They are nice people. They are good people. They look after me well here.” Staff told us that care plans gave them information on each person, and they discussed people’s needs and how to meet them at staff handovers. We observed staff supporting people with individual activities such as games and puzzles.

Care plans provided information for staff on how they should meet each person’s assessed needs. We saw that care plans were reviewed as people’s needs changed so that staff knew what support people required.

People told us that they would be able to talk to any member of staff if they had a complaint or concern, but no-one we spoke to had made any complaints.

We observed that staff and managers worked together as a team. The registered manager and staff showed that they were very dedicated to providing a caring atmosphere for the people who used the service. A relative said, “It’s like one big family here.”

12 September 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences.

We observed staff treating people with respect and encouraging them to hold conversations about their activities and their wishes.

One person we spoke with said that the staff gave them the support that they needed and understood how they liked to be assisted. Another person told us that they were able to do things that they enjoyed and to go out when they wished to.

Care plans provided detailed information on the support needed to meet each person's needs.

The premises provided a safe environment for people who use the service. Sharp knives and cleaning chemicals were stored securely to ensure that people did not have access to them, and that the risks of harm were addressed. The provider carried out monthly health and safety audits of the premises, and acted on any concerns found.

28 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences. We spoke with people about the choices they made about their daily lives. Most people were not able to respond to the questions, but two people told us that they liked the food that they had. A visiting relative said that their relative was looked after very well.

People's diversity, values and human rights were respected. Staff spoke with people and explained what they were doing while they supported them. Two people did not have English as their first language, and we heard staff speaking with them in their preferred language

Care and treatment was not always delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. We observed a member of staff assisting a person to walk in a potentially unsafe manner. The person's care plan did not provide clear guidance on supporting the person safely.

We observed two areas of risk for vulnerable people in the kitchen. Sharp kitchen knives were stored in an unlocked drawer. There were cleaning items in an unlocked cupboard under the kitchen sink. There were no measures in place to ensure that people did not have access to these areas of risk.