• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Evelyn Wright House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

32 Badby Road, Daventry, Northamptonshire, NN11 4AP (01327) 703140

Provided and run by:
Olympus Care Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16 August 2016

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection took place on 16 August 2016. This residential care home is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 35 older people. At the time of our inspection there were 31 people living at the home.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe in the home. Staff understood the need to protect people from harm and abuse and knew what action they should take if they had any concerns. Staffing levels ensured that people received the support they required at the times they needed. There were sufficient staff to meet the needs of the people and recruitment procedures protected people from receiving unsafe care from care staff unsuited to the job.

Care records contained risk assessments and risk management plans to protect people from identified risks and helped to keep them safe but also enabled positive risk taking. They gave information for staff on the identified risk and informed staff on the measures to take to minimise any risks.

People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed. Records showed that medicines were obtained, stored, administered and disposed of safely. People were supported to maintain good health and had access to healthcare services when needed.

Improvements were required to ensure that people received the correct support with their meals and this was done with a person centred approach. People’s nutritional needs were assessed and people were suitably supported with their healthcare. People were actively involved in decisions about their care and support needs. There were formal systems in place to assess people’s capacity for decision making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

Staff supported people in a caring and compassionate manner. People had their privacy and dignity respected and visitors were welcome at any time.

Care plans described the support people required and explained people’s preferences and routines. People were given choices about how and where they spent their time and this was respected by staff. People and their relatives were involved in reviewing their care and when suggestions were made, this was fully considered by the staff.

There was a complaints procedure in place and people were supported and empowered to make a complaint if they wished to. Complaints were investigated and appropriate actions were taken.

The registered manager had a number of systems in place to monitor the quality of the service. People at the home reacted positively to the registered manager and the culture within the home focussed upon supporting people’s health and well-being. Systems were in place for the home to receive and act on feedback and policies and procedures were available which reflected the care provided at the home.

30 September 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 30 September 2015 and was unannounced.

The service is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 35 older people. At the time of our inspection the service was at full capacity and 35 people were using the service.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

There were insufficient numbers of staff available to provide care in line with people’s needs, choices and preferences. Recruitment procedures also needed to be tightened in order to ensure that staff were suitable for their role in the home.

Staff were knowledgeable about safeguarding procedures and understood the need to report any concerns or suspicions of abuse. There was a need to improve the risk assessment processes and in some instances the lack of risk assessment prevented people from being as independent as they would have liked. Medicines were administered to people with a person-centred approach however there were gaps in medication records.

Staff supervision needed to be improved to ensure that staff received regular feedback about their performance. Staff had the appropriate knowledge to provide good care and people consented to the care they received. People had sufficient nutritional support and were supported to maintain good health.

People felt well cared for and people described staff as kind. Staff showed compassion and understood how to comfort people when they became distressed. People were encouraged to express their views and had access to an independent advocacy service. People’s privacy and dignity were supported and respected by staff.

People’s care needs were not always met in accordance with people’s preferences. People were enabled to be involved in reviews of their care however requests for changes were not always acted on. Although there were a variety of activities available some people were unaware of these and relied on staff to come and tell them when they were available.

There were inconsistencies in the leadership seen within the home and staff felt that teamwork could be improved. Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service however they did not always highlight areas that required improvement.

We identified a breach of a Regulation of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and you can see at the end of this report the action we have asked them to take.

28 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people that used the service. They all spoke very highly of the staff members that worked at the service. One person told us 'They get to know you and find out what you like and don't like'. Another person told us 'The carers really do care'.

We spoke with two people that worked at the service. They both told us that they enjoyed their roles and felt well supported.

We found that people's needs were assessed and that care plans were put in place to ensure that their needs were met. We found that people were protected from the risks associated with the unsafe use and management of medication.

We saw that there were appropriate arrangements in place to monitor and assess the service and that where concerns were identified that they were addressed.