• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Nottz Care

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

6 David Lane, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG6 0JU (0115) 964 8277

Provided and run by:
Nottz Care Limited

All Inspections

21 May 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: Nottz Care Limited provides personal care and support in people's homes to adults of all ages with a range of care needs. The service currently has 28 people registered to use the service, living in and around Nottinghamshire and Nottingham city centre.

People’s experience of using this service:

Robust recruitment processes were not in place to protect people from unsuitable staff.

This is a breach of Regulation 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We have asked the provider to provide us with an action plan in relation to this.

Care records were not personalised and did not always clearly reflect how staff were meeting people's specific health conditions.

Staff were able to identify and discuss the importance of maintaining people's respect and privacy at all times.

People told us they felt safe with the staff who supported them.

People and their relatives said staff were caring and respected their privacy and dignity.

People felt the service they received helped to maintain their independence where possible.

People knew how to complain and knew the process to follow if they had concerns.

People and staff felt the management was supportive and approachable.

Staff were happy in their role which had a positive effect on people's wellbeing.

Rating at last inspection: The service was previously inspected on 15 October 2018 and was rated as Good. Report published 8 November 2018.

Why we inspected: This was a scheduled inspection that was brought forward due to information received about risks in the service.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re -inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

15 October 2018

During a routine inspection

We inspected the service on 15 October 2018. The inspection was announced and was the provider’s first inspection since it was registered.

Nottinghamshire is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. Not everyone using Nottinghamshire receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. Nottinghamshire provides a service to older adults and younger adults with a disability. At the time of our inspection, 15 people were receiving personal care as part of their care package.

A registered manager was in place and available on the day of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected as far as possible from abuse and avoidable harm. Staff had received safeguarding training, the provider had a policies and procedures and staff were clear about their role and responsibilities. Risks associated with people’s needs including the environment had been assessed and planned for. Staff had guidance that was up to date in how to provide safe care. The provider had a system to record and analyse accidents and incidents to reduce further reoccurrence.

People were cared for by sufficient numbers of staff that had the required skills and competency to meet their needs. People received care from regular staff that knew them well. No person had experienced missed calls and late calls were infrequent, people were informed if staff were delayed. Safe staff recruitment checks were completed before staff commenced their employment.

Where required, people received safe support with their prescribed medicines. Staff had received training and had a medicines policy and procedure to support them. Staff had information about how to administer people’s medicines.

People were protected from the risk of cross contamination. Staff wore personal protective equipment, had received training in infection control and were knowledgeable about how to reduce risks to people.

People had their individual needs assessed, including their protected characteristics under the Equality Act to ensure staff understood what care was required. People were supported by staff who had received an induction and ongoing training. The management team assessed staff’s competency to provide effective care and support. Staff were knowledgeable about people’s care needs that showed they had developed positive relationships with people.

Where people required assistance with dietary and nutritional needs, staff had guidance of what was required of them. People’s healthcare needs had been assessed and staff monitored their health and acted if a person was unwell. Staff had been provided with health information factsheets to support their awareness and understanding of people’s health conditions.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported by staff that were kind, caring and compassionate and who knew them well. People received a staff rota informing them what staff to expect. Consideration of people’s language, sensory and communication needs were assessed and planned for. People were involved in their care and support.

Staff were confident they had sufficient information to provide a personalised service, important information about people’s preferences were known and understood, and care was delivered in line with this. The complaints procedure had been made available to people.

The provider had systems and processes in place to monitor quality and safety and people received opportunities to feedback about their experience if the service they received.