• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Primecare Oral Health Services - Worcester St. John's

St. John's Dental Practice, Malvern Road - St Johns, Worcester, Worcestershire, WR2 4EL 0330 123 9126

Provided and run by:
Primecare Oral Health Services Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

15 January 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 05 January 2015.

The practice is owned by Primecare Oral Health Services Limited. There are four dentists within the practice who are supported by a dental hygienist, five dental nurses, and a receptionist and there is a practice manager.

The practice provides primary NHS dental services to both adults and to children. The practice is open Monday to Friday from 9.00am to 5.30pm. There is also a late opening until 8pm on a Thursday. Services are available from 9am to 1pm on a Saturday by appointment only.

Primecare Oral Health Services Limited is the registered provider for the practice and there is an identified registered person. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

We viewed 14 CQC comment cards that had been left for patients to complete, prior to our visit, about the services provided. All of the comment cards reflected positive comments about the staff and the services provided. Patients commented that the practice was clean and hygienic, they found the staff very friendly and approachable and they found the quality of the dentistry to be excellent. They said explanations were clear and made the dental experience as comfortable as possible

The practice was providing care which was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice recorded and analysed significant events and complaints and cascaded learning to staff.
  • Staff had received formal safeguarding training and knew the processes to follow to raise any concerns.
  • There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
  • Staff had been trained to deal with medical emergencies and appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were readily available.
  • Infection control procedures were in place and the practice followed published guidance.
  • Patients’ care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with evidence based guidelines, best practice and current legislation.
  • Patients received clear explanations about their proposed treatment, costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
  • The appointment system met the needs of patients and waiting times were kept to a minimum.
  • There was an effective complaints system.
  • The practice was well-led and staff felt involved and worked as a team.
  • Governance systems were effective and there was a range of clinical and non-clinical audits to monitor the quality of services.
  • The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services they provided.

4 April 2013

During a routine inspection

The inspection was discussed and arranged with the practice shortly in advance. This was to ensure that we had time to see and speak with staff working there.

We spoke with the practice manager and four dental nurses. We also spoke on the telephone with five people who had recently used the practice.

People who used the practice told us that they were happy with the quality of treatment they had received. One person told us: 'It's fantastic. Everybody's helpful. I can't speak too highly about the place. I like the friendliness as I walk in.' Another person said: 'We recommended a friend to go there and she's been very happy. Everything's been fine.'

People felt they were given enough information about their treatment options and the relevant fees, and were able to ask all the questions they wanted to.

People were protected from the risk of abuse because staff had been trained how to recognise signs of abuse and knew how to report concerns.

We found that people received care and treatment in a clean and hygienic environment. People we spoke with had no concerns about the cleanliness of the practice.

We found that staff were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

We looked at records which showed that the provider was regularly monitoring the quality of its service.