• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Prestige Nursing Northampton

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit S22,23 & S24,25, Moulton Park Business Centre, Redhouse Road, Moulton Park Industrial Estate, Northampton, NN3 6AQ (01604) 637000

Provided and run by:
Prestige Nursing Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

The service is a homecare service. At the time of the assessment, 8 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

This service supports older people, some of whom are living with dementia, and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.

We carried out this assessment from 06 August to 11 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

Staff at Prestige Nursing Northampton were aware of risks to people’s safety and knew how to raise concerns. We reviewed risk management plans which contained sufficient guidance to be clearly followed. Staff understood the importance of this, and one told us they “would never carry out care or support that was outside of their care plan guidelines or that appeared unsafe or risky without seeking advice from management.”

Staff understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding people from abuse and the provider had effective systems in place to monitor, report and address concerns. When accidents or incidents occurred, the provider took action to ensure people’s safety and put measures in place to minimise risks to people going forward.

People’s needs were assessed before they began receiving support, and staff understood how to meet those needs and respond to changes in their wellbeing. People’s care needs were met, and staff demonstrated a person-centred approach to supporting health and wellbeing. For example, one person told us that during the Covid 19 outbreak she developed anxiety about going out. She told us how her carer “slowly, slowly started to introduce me to go back out again" and “I’d probably still be stuck in my flat, so it’s been life changing for me and helped with my mental health." Staff worked with people to achieve positive outcomes. People were supported to make their own decisions and choices, with staff routinely seeking consent before providing care and support. A staff member told us, “I enjoy supporting people to remain as independent as possible in their own homes and I value being part of a team that provides person-centred care.”

Care plans were regularly reviewed and changes made as needed. One relative told us they had a copy of the care plan, and it was reviewed every year. Another person told us their care plan had recently been reassessed and staff used it to “help her to maintain her independence”. We reviewed care plans and found some inconsistencies in them. The manager rectified these and no harm had come to people consequently. The provider is moving to a digital notes system which will help to ensure compliance with care records and the managers governance.

Staff were recruited safely and received a broad range of training to support them in their roles. They told us they felt fully supported by the manager and their supervisors and were able to contact them for advice at any time. One staff member told us, “Regular supervision and opportunities to discuss concerns are important, particularly when supporting people with more complex needs.” Another described when she reported a concern to her manager and it was dealt with and the outcome given. This meant staff felt able to discuss any issues with the manager and their supervisors which helps to ensure people have their needs met and are safe.

Robust systems were in place to manage people’s medicines and staff explained these to us including the process if they ever had any concerns about medication administering. There was staff training for safe infection prevention and control procedures. However, some people advised us that the carers had not worn suitable PPE or washed their hands enough. On these occasions they had contacted the main office, and this was quickly resolved. We discussed this with the manager during the inspection, and they assured us that further training would be provided as necessary.

6 July 2018

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 6,13,16 and 18 July 2018 and was announced.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to younger and older adults, children and people with disabilities.

Not everyone using Prestige Nursing Northampton receives a regulated activity. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.’

People were protected from the risk of harm. Staff had been trained in safeguarding people and understood how to report any concerns of abuse. Risks to people’s safety were assessed to ensure preventative action was taken to reduce the risk of harm to people.

People were supported with their medicines in a safe way. People’s nutritional needs were met and they were supported with their health care needs when required. The service worked with other organisations to ensure that people received coordinated care and support.

People were protected by safe recruitment procedures to ensure staff were suitable to work in care services. There were enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff received training for their role and ongoing support and supervision to work effectively.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The provider, manager and staff demonstrated their understanding of the Mental Capacity Act, 2005 (MCA) and gained people's consent before they were supported.

People were involved all aspects of their care. People’s care plans information available about people’s preferences, daily routines and diverse cultural needs. Staff had a good understanding of people's needs and preferences and worked flexibly to ensure they were met.

People and their relatives were happy with staff who provided their personal care and had developed positive trusting relationships. People were treated with dignity and respect, and their rights to privacy were upheld.

People, relatives and staff were encouraged to provide feedback about the service and this was used to drive continuous improvement. People and relatives all spoke positively about the staff team and how the service was managed. The provider had a process in place which ensured people could raise any complaints or concerns.

The registered manager and staff team were committed to following the vision and values of the service in providing good quality care. The registered manager was aware of their legal responsibilities and provided effective leadership and support to staff. Quality assurance systems were used to monitor and assess the quality of the service to drive continuous improvement. The provider worked in partnership with other agencies to meet people’s needs.