• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Housing & Care 21 - Richmond Upon Thames

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Regal House, 70 London Road, Twickenham, TW1 3QS 0303 123 1261

Provided and run by:
Housing 21

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

27 January 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection that took place on 27 and 28 January 2015.

The agency provides short term domiciliary re-enablement care contracted by the local authority. It also provides longer term personal care. Re-enablement is the process whereby people are supported to regain the skills to live independently. There were 83 people receiving a service.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

In April 2013, our inspection found that the service met the regulations we inspected against. At this inspection the home met the regulations.

People told us they were very happy with the service provided. The designated tasks were carried out to their satisfaction, they felt safe and the staff team and organisation really cared. The service provided was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.

The records were kept up to date and covered all aspects of the care and support people received their choices and identified and met their needs. They contained clearly recorded, fully completed, and regularly reviewed information that enabled staff to perform their duties well.

The staff we spoke with where knowledgeable about the people they supported, the way they liked to be supported and worked well as a team. They had appropriate skills and provided care and support in a professional, friendly and supportive way that was focussed on the individual.

People and their relatives were encouraged to discuss health and other needs with staff and had agreed information passed on to GP’s and other community based health professionals, as required.

People were protected from nutrition and hydration associated risks with balanced diets that also met their likes, dislikes and preferences. People were positive about the choice and quality of the service provided.

The staff were well trained, knowledgeable, professional and accessible to people using the service and their relatives. Staff said the organisation was a good one to work for and they enjoyed their work at Housing and Care 21 Richmond. They had access to good training, support and there were opportunities for career advancement.

People said the management team and organisation were approachable, responsive, encouraged feedback from them and consistently monitored and assessed the quality of the service provided.

26 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People generally made positive comments about the service. "I am very pleased with the service I receive". "The carer turns up on time and does what she is supposed to". "They are all very pleasant to me".

They told us they felt respected, safe and were involved in decision-making about their care and received enough information to decide if they wanted the service.

Staff were approachable, listened to their views, acted on them and treated them with respect.

The agency were in regular contact and asked them if they thought they were receiving the service they needed.

The service was regularly reviewed, updated and mostly delivered on time.

Staff were friendly, flexible and competent adapting their working practices to provide a good quality of service.

People using the service were also aware of how to make a complaint and who to.

We saw there was suitable information provided to decide if people wanted the service.

The records were accessible, up to date and they were regularly reviewed for both services.

There was a safeguarding policy and procedure and staff received safeguarding training.

Staff were well supported, received annual appraisals and regular supervision. They also received the training they required to do their jobs.

There was an accessible easy to understand complaints policy and procedure. People using the re-enablement service also had access to the council complaints procedure.

6 July 2012

During a routine inspection

People generally made very positive comments about the service. These were in the agency and stakeholder reviews and telephone interviews we carried out.

They told us they felt respected, safe and were involved in decision-making about the care they received. They said the agency staff were very approachable, listened to their views, acted on them and treated them with respect.

They commented that the agency were in regular contact, visited them, asked them what they needed and they felt they were getting the service they wanted. They said it was regularly reviewed, updated and mostly delivered on time.

They found staff friendly, competent and flexible in adapting their working practices to provide a good quality of service.

They were also aware of how to make a complaint and who to.