• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Real Life Options - Forest Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

4 Forest Road, Moseley, Birmingham, West Midlands, B13 9DL (0121) 442 2246

Provided and run by:
Real Life Options

Important: This service was previously managed by a different provider - see old profile

All Inspections

8 June 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 7 June 2016 and was unannounced. We last inspected the service in November 2013 and found it was compliant with all the regulations we looked at.

The service is registered to provide care for up to five people who have a learning disability and had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used the service and their relatives told us that the home was safe. Staff were aware of the need to keep people safe and they knew how to report allegations or suspicions of poor practice.

People were protected from possible errors in relation to their medication because the arrangements for the storage, administration and recording of medication were good and there were robust systems for checking that medication had been administered in the correct way.

There were sufficient appropriately trained, skilled and supervised staff and they received opportunities to further develop their skills.

The registered manager had approached the appropriate authority when it was felt there was a risk people were being supported in a way which could restrict their freedom. Staff had been provided with training about the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) but not all staff were aware that Deprivation of Liberty applications had been submitted.

People were supported to maintain good health and to access appropriate support from health professionals where needed. People were supported to eat meals which they enjoyed and which met their needs in terms of nutrition and assessed risks.

People told us or indicated by gestures and their body language that they were happy at this home and this was confirmed by people's relatives. We observed caring staff practice, and staff we spoke with demonstrated a positive regard for the people they were supporting. People and, where appropriate, their relatives, were consulted about their preferences and people were treated with dignity and respect.

People’s needs had been assessed and care plans developed to inform staff how to support people appropriately. Staff demonstrated an understanding of people’s individual needs and preferences.

The registered manager had a good level of understanding in relation to the requirements of the law and the responsibilities of her role. We had not been notified about some incidents that we should have been to comply with regulations. It was not evident that arrangements for checking the safety and quality of the service by the registered provider were effective in driving forward continuous improvement and making sure identified areas for improvement were actioned.

27 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited this home on a weekday. We met four members of the staff team and three people who lived in the home. We spoke to a health professional who was visiting the home and contacted two relatives and the manager by telephone.

There were good arrangements for assessing people’s needs and for planning the care and support which each person needed. The plans addressed people’s emotional, social and physical needs.

We found that staff were well supported in the home and had access to relevant training. We observed staff communicating well with people in the home. A relative told us how staff shared information with them. They said, “I can’t speak highly enough of the staff…we work together…they pick up the phone to me and we have a real dialogue.” Another relative described the staff as, 'lovely', 'helpful' and 'kind.'

A health professional told us that she considered the home to be ‘excellent’, providing an example of how the staff had ‘done really well’ in bringing about positive changes in a person’s life.

People told us that they were happy in this home. People told us about the variety of activities in which they participated on a daily basis.

We found that there were suitable arrangements for the storage, administration and recording of medication.

There were good systems for monitoring the performance of the home and for making sure that staff carried out their roles in the right way.

22 February 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our visit in February 2013, there were five people living in the home. Most people had lived at the home since it opened and one had moved in on a temporary basis from elsewhere. Some people were unable to communicate verbally and as such we observed practice and saw that staff interacted well with people, ensuring they were treated with dignity and respect. Most people were unable to make informed decisions about their care and welfare and as such evidence was noted of best interest decision making where appropriate. People were observed being involved in managing the daily activities of the home and everyone was observed going out with staff at different points during the day. This ensured that they maintained both their independence and a physical need to be active.

Evidence of verbal encouragement was noted to good effect and staff demonstrated their detailed knowledge of people by responding appropriately to gestures, tones or other expressions. During the course of the inspection, staff were heard to be offering people choices, ensuring person centred care.