• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Holly House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

11 Elsee Road, Rugby, Warwickshire, CV21 3BA (01788) 878671

Provided and run by:
Todd Property Management Limited

All Inspections

28 July 2015

During a routine inspection

Holly House is a domiciliary care agency which provides personal care and support to people with learning difficulties in their own homes. At the time of our visit the service supported six people. Five people lived in a shared house, and one person lived in a separate flat.

We inspected the service on 28 July 2015. The provider was told we were coming so they could arrange for staff to be available to talk with us about the service.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe using the service. Staff demonstrated they understood the importance of keeping people safe. They understood their responsibilities for reporting any concerns regarding potential abuse. Risks to people’s health and welfare were assessed and care plans gave staff instructions on how to minimise identified risks, so staff knew how to support people safely.

There were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs. The recruitment process checked staff’s suitability to deliver personal care safely. Staff received training and support that ensured people’s needs were met effectively. Staff supported people with kindness and compassion, and treated people in a way that respected their dignity and promoted their independence.

Management and staff understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and supported people in line with these principles. People’s records showed that their families and other health professionals were involved in decisions made in their best interests.

People were encouraged to maintain their independence and they were involved in planning how they were cared for and supported. Care was planned to meet people’s individual needs and preferences, and care plans were regularly reviewed.

The provider and registered manager were dedicated to providing quality care to people. Staff and people who used the service found them open, approachable, and responsive. There were processes to monitor the quality of the service provided and to understand the experiences of people who used the service. This was through regular communication with people and staff, checks on records, returned surveys from people who used the service, health professionals and staff and a programme of checks and audits.

13 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who used Holly House about their experiences of the service. During our inspection, where possible, we observed the care given to people. We spoke with a range of staff including the registered manager.

People we spoke with told us that the care planning was discussed with them regularly. We saw they were involved with the planning of their care and had signed their plan to confirm their involvement.

We found that staff listened to people about their care needs and their wishes. We saw people's independence was promoted within their care plans and observed this on the day of our inspection.

We found that the care plans were person centred and reflected people's individual needs. We saw that staff supported people as detailed within their care plans. We observed that staff were compassionate and caring when supporting people.

People we spoke with told us that staff were friendly and supported their needs well. We spoke with staff who demonstrated awareness of people's care needs were and how they needed to be supported.

We spoke with two staff members about what they thought abuse was and they showed they had a good awareness of the importance of keeping people safe. They understood their responsibilities for reporting any concerns regarding potential abuse.

We saw people's care records, including risk assessments, were accurate and fit for purpose. We reviewed two care plans and found the records were easily accessible.

11 December 2012

During a routine inspection

When we visited Holly House there were no people using the service. The care home was open to people who wanted to use the service and the provider was in discussion with local authorities about people using the services at Holly House.

We met the provider, the registered manager and the staff team during our visit.

We found the provider had produced policies and procedures appropriate for the delivery of care at Holly House.

We found that care planning documentation had been prepared and we reviewed the proposed care planning process. We found that care plans made provision for all aspects of care delivery and the possible risks associated around maintaining and promoting the well being of a person who used the service.

A staff team had been recruited and their induction training had commenced. We met and spoke with three members of staff when we visited Holly House.

The environment was clean and warm and ready for people to use the service.

We shall visit Holly House early in our inspection programme for 2013 -2014 to meet with people who come to use the service to seek their views on the care delivered to them.