• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Lucy Glyn Domiciliary Care Agency

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

9 Evesham Place, Stratford Upon Avon, Warwickshire, CV37 6HT (01789) 297353

Provided and run by:
Lucy Glyn Support Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

2 February 2016

During a routine inspection

Lucy Glyn Domiciliary Care Agency provides personal care to people with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, who live in their own homes. At the time of our visit the service supported six people who received 24 hour care in their own homes.

We inspected the service on 2 February 2016. The inspection was announced. This was to ensure the registered manager and staff were available when we visited, to talk with us about the service.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Care was person centred and was planned to meet people’s individual needs, abilities and preferences. Health professionals commented on the high standard of care provided. People received support based on their individual needs, which helped to improve the quality of their lives. People were supported to participate in activities that were meaningful to them. Staff used different methods to obtain feedback from people, which were tailored to meet people’s individual needs. People were encouraged to be involved in planning how they were cared for and supported.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe using the service. Staff demonstrated they understood the importance of keeping people safe. They understood their responsibilities for reporting any concerns regarding potential abuse. Risks to people’s health and welfare were assessed and support plans gave staff instructions on how to minimise identified risks, so staff knew how to support people safely.

There were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs. The registered manager checked staff’s suitability to deliver care safely and considered the views of people who used the service in their recruitment decisions. Staff received training and support that ensured people’s needs were met effectively. Staff supported people with kindness and compassion, and treated people in a way that respected their dignity and promoted their independence.

Management and staff understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and supported people in line with these principles. The registered manager had made DoLS applications where potential restrictions on people’s liberty had been identified. However, these applications had not yet been authorised. Where people did not have capacity to make decisions, decisions were made in people’s best interests.

People’s health needs were monitored and they were referred to external healthcare professionals when a need was identified. Healthcare professionals were positive about the care provided.

People told us they would raise concerns or complaints with staff or managers if they needed to. People were encouraged to share their views about the quality of service provided through regular reviews and questionnaires.

The registered manager and the deputy manager maintained an open culture in the service and they were accessible to people. There was good communication between staff members and staff were encouraged to share ideas to make improvements to the service.

The registered manager was dedicated to providing quality care to people. They had used guidance and research to provide a service that stimulated people and kept people safe. They followed good practice initiatives and worked alongside other organisations and health care agencies to develop innovative ways of supporting people. There were processes in place to ensure good standards of care were maintained for people.

20 September 2013

During a routine inspection

When we visited the service we found that five people used the service and we met and spoke with four of these people. We spoke with four members of staff who delivered care, the registered manager and the deputy service manager. We spoke with one relative by telephone. We read the care records for everyone who used the service. We read five staff files and service records about complaints and quality assurance.

We spoke with one relative who told us, "They are excellent, I can't fault them." We spoke with one person who used the service who told us, "I do lots of things now. I go out every day. I go out walking, I do shopping, play football, go to the pub and I've been on holiday."

We found that staff had a good understanding of the needs of the people who used the service. We found that care and support was planned and delivered in a safe way, in line with people's individual care needs and preferences.

We saw that the provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided.

We found that there was an effective recruitment process in place to ensure that staff had the skills to meet people's needs.

We found that people were supported to raise any concerns and saw that concerns were dealt with effectively and in a timely way.

20 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We visited this service on 20 August 2012. The visit was unannounced so that no one who worked for or used the service knew we were coming.

During our inspection we met and spoke with the registered manager, the deputy manager and one member of staff. We also spoke with four members of staff, one associated professional and two people using the service by telephone.

People we spoke with told us that they were happy with the service being received and the staff providing their care, making comments such as "yes, I am , absolutely" and "yes I am happy with the staff."

People had care plans in place that contained information to assist staff with meeting their care needs. Staff we spoke with were knowledgeable about the care needs of the people they worked with.

Staff we spoke with demonstrated that they were knowledgeable about protecting

vulnerable people from abuse.

Staff told us that the training provided by the organisation was good, and that they felt

supported through regular supervision with their line manager.

We saw that the service had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided.