• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Mercian House Dental Practice

16 York Street, Stourport On Severn, Worcestershire, DY13 9EE (01299) 827437

Provided and run by:
Jugminder Sanghera & Tina Devi Sanghera

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 15 June 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the practice was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The inspection was carried out on 3 May 2016 by a CQC inspector, a CQC head of inspection for dentistry acting as a second inspector and a dental specialist adviser. Before the inspection we reviewed information we held about the provider and information that we asked them to send us in advance of the inspection.

During the inspection we spoke with members of the practice team including the dentist who is the registered manager, dental nurses, and a receptionist. We looked around the premises including the decontamination room and treatment rooms. We viewed a range of policies and procedures and other documents and read the comments made by 26 patients in comment cards provided by CQC before the inspection.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

  • Is it safe?

  • Is it effective?

  • Is it caring?

  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?

  • Is it well-led?

These questions therefore formed the framework for the areas we looked at during the inspection.

Overall inspection

Updated 15 June 2016

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 3 May 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions: Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Mercian House dental practice is in Stourport on Severn town centre. The practice has two separate registrations with CQC. This is because the NHS treatment is provided by Jugminder Sanghera & Tina Devi Sanghera, a partnership, while private treatment is provided by J and T Sanghera Limited, a company. Because of this we produce two inspection reports. This report is about the service provided by the partnership to provide care for children and adults under the NHS. One of the partners is the principal dentist and registered manager, a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice has one dentist (the registered manager), a dental therapist, two dental hygienists, three dental nurses and a trainee dental nurse. The clinical team are supported by two reception staff. The dentist takes the lead role in the day to day organisation of the practice.

The practice has three dental treatment rooms and a decontamination room for the cleaning, sterilising and packing of dental instruments. There is level access from the pavement into the practice entrance hall, reception and waiting area. The patient toilet is on the ground floor. There are three steps to two treatment rooms and the staff areas; the other treatment room is on the ground floor.

The practice is open from 8.30am to 6pm on Tuesdays, 9am to 6pm on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays and 8.30am to 5pm on Fridays.

Before the inspection we sent Care Quality Commission comment cards to the practice for patients to use to tell us about their experience of the practice. We collected 26 completed cards and also saw the practice’s NHS Friends and Family survey results for 2015. All the information showed that patients had a consistently positive view of the service the practice provides. Patients described the practice team as professional, friendly, caring and polite. They said they received calm, gentle treatment and careful explanations of the treatment they needed in language they could understand. The Friends and Family results collated in April 2015 showed that patients were likely, or extremely likely, to recommend the service. The November 2015 results all showed that patients were extremely likely to recommend the service.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was visibly clean and a number of patients mentioned that the practice was always clean and hygienic. The practice had systems to assess and manage infection prevention and control.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had clear processes for dealing with medical emergencies and for ensuring that dental equipment was available and regularly maintained.
  • Dental care records provided clear and detailed information about patients’ care and treatment.
  • Staff received training appropriate to their roles and were supported in their continued professional development.
  • Patients were able to make routine and emergency appointments when needed.
  • The practice had established a variety of ways to gather patients’ views including in-house surveys and the NHS Friends and Family test.
  • Patients received a responsive service and staff treated them in a thoughtful, respectful and professional way.
  • The practice had governance processes to manage the practice effectively.
  • We identified the practice had established a patient participation group. Members were invited to come to the practice each year. The practice used the meetings as another way to obtain patients’ views and written minutes were made and shared in the practice newsletter. This showed a positive and open approach to listening to patients. We believe this to be notable practice which is worth sharing.