We carried out a review of the data available to us about Alina Homecare Lancing on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Alina Homecare Lancing, you can give feedback on this service.
Alina Homecare – Lancing is a domiciliary care agency. It provides care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to younger adults and older people and included people who were living with a physical disability, mental health conditions and dementia. The service was also registered to provide care for children aged 0-18 years of age; although at the time of the inspection no children were receiving a service. On the days of inspection there were 27 people who received support with the regulated activity of personal care.
Alina Homecare provides care at home as well as live-in services for people across England. People can fund their own care or have this publically funded. Alina Homecare Lancing was registered in May 2017 and is part of a group of services owned by the provider. The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us that they received a service that made a difference to their lives, that positive relationships had developed between them and staff, who took time to get to know them and their preferences. People were treated with respect, their dignity and privacy maintained. The provider, registered manager and staff provided people with compassionate care and some people told us that they viewed staff as friends. One person told us, “They talk to me. They help me not to feel lonely”.
People’s consent was gained and they were involved in their care, their wishes and preferences were respected and care was person-centred and tailored to their needs. People and relatives told us about a service that was responsive and adapted to changes in their needs and requirements. Efforts had been made to gather information about people’s background, their hobbies and interests to provide staff with an insight into people’s lives before they started to use the service. Staff were introduced to people prior to offering support and people told us that this made them feel comfortable as they knew who to expect once their visits began.
People told us that they would feel comfortable to raise issues or concerns and that the registered manager was friendly and approachable. People, their relatives and staff were complimentary about the leadership and management of the service. A relative told us, “If I were assessing the managers on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being excellent), I would give them 10”.
It was evident that good quality care and positive experiences were at the heart of the provider’s aims and that these were filtered down through staff and embedded in their practice. There were robust quality assurance processes to ensure that people received the quality of service they had a right to expect and that the service continually improved. People, their relatives and staff told us that they were involved in decisions that affected people’s care and the running of the service. That their suggestions and feedback were welcomed and listened to. There was good partnership working with external healthcare professionals to ensure best practice and maintain a coordinated approach to care.
People told us that they felt safe due to the support that they received from staff. One person told us, “I feel safe because I feel I am with friends when carers come. They spend time to chat and listen whilst they do their jobs”. Staff had a good understanding of how to support people safely and knew what to do if they had concerns about people’s safety. There was a reflective approach to providing care and the provider, registered manager and staff learned from instances to ensure that care continually improved. People were supported to have their medicines safety and on time and were protected from the risk of infection and cross contamination.
People and their relatives felt that staff had appropriate skills and were competent. One person told us, “They are well trained and very professional”. People’s wishes, abilities and needs were documented and staff were provided with guidance. Staff had a good understanding of the people they supported and people told us that they received care from consistent staff who knew them and their needs well.
One person summed up their thoughts on the service they received, they told us, “If you asked me what do they do well I would say they do everything well”.