• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

My Home Care Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit G23, The Avenues, Eleventh Avenue North, Team Valley Trading Estate, Gateshead, Tyne And Wear, NE11 0NJ (0191) 487 4494

Provided and run by:
Elizabeth Rose Care Limited

Assessment report published 9 February 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

5 February 2026

Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

At the last inspection this key question was rated good. At this inspection the key question has remained good. This meant the service management and leadership were consistent. Leaders and the culture they created supported the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.Equality and diversity within the service was promoted. New staff received support and training which helped them to show those values in their daily work with people. A staff member told us, “I love making people happy which makes me happy I enjoy their company knowing that I do a good thing.”

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The registered manager demonstrated they had the skills and knowledge to manage the service effectively. A staff member commented, “Our management team are very approachable.”

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The provider fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. Processes were in place for staff and people to speak up. The provider had a clear whistle blowing policy. Staff could raise concerns and the information about how to do this was available in the staff handbook. Staff meetings took place. Staff told us they felt valued and supported by the management team. They were encouraged to voice their opinions, ideas and suggestions. A staff member told us, “We have regular staff meetings and can make any suggestions, we are listened to.”

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them. Staff had received equality and diversity training. Staff told us they were treated equally and did not experience any discrimination. They told us they felt valued and respected in their roles. They said they felt supported by the management, some said they were well-supported personally when needed. A staff member told us, “I feel like a respected member of staff and feel we all make a great team.”

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 2

The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate. There was oversight from the provider to review the quality and safety of the service in line with regulatory requirements, with regular quality checks carried out. However, audits needed to be more robust to ensure the quality and safety of service provision. Improvements were needed to some care records to ensure people received person-centred care.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

Staff at the service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement. Staff worked alongside other professionals to ensure appropriate support was provided. A relative commented, “The [staff] accompanied [Name] for their hospital appointment, putting my mind at rest straight away.”

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The provider focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. Staff and leaders had a good understanding of how to make improvement happen. Leaders encouraged staff to speak up with ideas for improvement. Processes to ensure that learning happens when things go wrong, and from examples of good practice, were well-established.